- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 110
Hillier has come out saying that Canada is at more risk of a direct attack now than at any time during the cold war, any thoughts on that assessment?
Nielsen_Noetic said:Then again if there was a terrrorist attack while the liberals were in office maybe the east would be shaken enough to vote conservative
Slim said:Yes...I know it for a fact.
Without releasing too much i will say that there have been people caught in major city centers doing targeting related activities when arrested.
These people were found to be sympathetic to the Taliban and the AQ.
Sorry no source for this one folks. Pm me if there are any issues with verafication please.
Slim
In some respects, Canada and Canadians, despite their not being fully au fait with it, are at more risk now of direct attack than they have ever been during the Cold War itself."
Bo said:Also, who would want to attack Canada? I doubt very much any terrorist organization would consider an attack on Canada to be a worthy cause. The only thing that they would accomplish is making another enemy.
Bo said:Also, who would want to attack Canada? I doubt very much any terrorist organization would consider an attack on Canada to be a worthy cause. The only thing that they would accomplish is making another enemy.
scm77 said:That's strange, I could've swarn the terrorists were already our enemy. Oh well, guess I'm just a moron. :
ShaBoing said:actually from what we were also told in the lecture in police foundations we are number 5 on Al Quida's list of top 10 countries to attack following 1) US 2) GB 3) i cant remember 4) australia then 5) canada.
all the countries on the list b4 us have been attacked by Al Quida already
Bo said:Ok, so we're at risk of getting attacked by Al Qaeda. Why?