- Reaction score
- 27,477
- Points
- 1,090
I believe medical and legal professional misconduct can be given professional sanction post retirement as well.
I believe medical and legal professional misconduct can be given professional sanction post retirement as well.
Don't underestimate the importance of professional denunciation as well, for both the professional body or the general public.
Sure, but that effectively happens when a cop ends up in the newspaper and then quits to dodge a conduct. They aren’t then getting back in; they’re done professionally.
Toronto StarUnlike police, doctors, lawyers and others, complaints against ( Toronto ) emergency medical service staff are investigated internally and in secret. The service never announces the results or what is done to fix the problem.
The family is seeking $101 million in damages.
He was further deprived of necessary, life-saving medical care when a decision was made to transport him to St. Michael’s Hospital, located 34 km and approximately 33 minutes away from the scene, while Credit Valley Hospital was only 2.3 km from the scene.
there are presently several people under investigation/conduct charges getting jobs in a neighbouring province ducking their misconduct. The hiring agency is aware- that’s the dire reality of recruiting presently.Back-in-the-day, when there were lots of little town police services in Ontario, it was not unheard of for a member to dodge an internal investigation by quitting a larger department and being hired by a smaller one. Standards were a lot looser and background checks were often cursory.
I did a criminal investigation on a member of a small town service back in the '90s which resulted in the member being charged. I wasn't out for blood but it was an 'honesty and integrity' issue and I was adamant with the Crown that I wanted a conviction, no discharges, so they couldn't return to the profession.
We had a cop on the WPS who was suspended without pay. The cop in question was an old time cop who was well respected by the rank and file but not so much the WPS chief at the time.Back-in-the-day, when there were lots of little town police services in Ontario, it was not unheard of for a member to dodge an internal investigation by quitting a larger department and being hired by a smaller one. Standards were a lot looser and background checks were often cursory.
I did a criminal investigation on a member of a small town service back in the '90s which resulted in the member being charged. I wasn't out for blood but it was an 'honesty and integrity' issue and I was adamant with the Crown that I wanted a conviction, no discharges, so they couldn't return to the profession.
And well he should; the rules are pretty clear.We had a cop on the WPS who was suspended without pay. The cop in question was an old time cop who was well respected by the rank and file but not so much the WPS chief at the time.
He grieved and won as he had not been found guilty yet.
Wow, that’s some shameful shit. They’re at the point of knowingly hiring someone who comes in with a recently dirty McNeil?If not only to have a record of a decision that keeps them from just getting a job somewhere else in the field.
there are presently several people under investigation/conduct charges getting jobs in a neighbouring province ducking their misconduct. The hiring agency is aware- that’s the dire reality of recruiting presently.
The end result will be a collapse of those disciplinary processes
Is policing a profession or a job? If it's a profession then there are requirements for regulating the profession - including condemnation of conduct while a member of the profession, even if that sanction comes after leaving the profession.
If it's merely a job, well, ...
From the examples of OPS, it appears in the context of Ontario policing that current tools are inadequate, and do not either correct individual behaviours or provide a deterrence to others.
We have one big problem in selecting police officers. We have to recruit from the human race.
It’s terrible. But there won’t be a finding- just an allegation. I was shocked. More than one.Wow, that’s some shameful shit. They’re at the point of knowingly hiring someone who comes in with a recently dirty McNeil?
Call it whichever you will. I think every one of us in this thread is more than comfortable with there being stringent professional standards that are consistently upheld.
100%. And I still believe in the people we work with- they’re more like you than any of the outliers that make the news.Call it whichever you will. I think every one of us in this thread is more than comfortable with there being stringent professional standards that are consistently upheld.
The existence of an investigation alone, without the allegation being cleared, should be enough to trigger a McNeil disclosure obligation. You bet your ass defense counsel will know to watch for that.It’s terrible. But there won’t be a finding- just an allegation. I was shocked. More than one.