Anything beginning with “apparently” is an assertion begging for an attributable source.
Hamas invaded Israel 2023
- Thread starter McG
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 2,075
- Points
- 1,160
OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 15,531
- Points
- 1,260
You also have the responsibility to act like a civil society and not invade, kill, kidnap and rape your neighbors.Here is the implied right of self defence…
“(iv) the State of Palestine meets all the requirements of statehood according to the 1933 Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States”
This is a convention that only 20 countries have signed, and has not been ratified by Canada.
And here is the motion:
M-113 State of Palestine 44th Parliament, 1st Session - Members of Parliament - House of Commons of Canada
M-113 State of Palestine 44th Parliament, 1st Session - Members of Parliament - House of Commons of Canadawww.ourcommons.ca
There no
I haven’t seen any other Bill tabled yet.
Has anyone in that brain dead party - the NDP - thought of that? Bet not.
That appears to refer to negotiations over a motion, which is not enforceable at all, but doesn’t say anything about actually introducing a bill. It also mentions that the government has shown no sign of budging on a formal recognition of Palestinian sovereignty.
I’m seeing nothing on this that’s anything more than non-binding symbolism.
- Reaction score
- 27,477
- Points
- 1,090
lenaitch
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,713
- Points
- 1,160
And certainly not by Israel, which didn't even exist back then.
- Reaction score
- 356
- Points
- 780
Oh Shit!!!
- Reaction score
- 1,400
- Points
- 1,160
Quirky
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,649
- Points
- 1,260
NDP tackling the important issues.
Israel needs to finish this quick, like a band-aid, right off!
ArmyRick
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,346
- Points
- 1,010
I am surprised Singh took five minutes away from picking a fight with The Weston family to deal with this.
- Reaction score
- 1,852
- Points
- 1,260
So what does that actually mean? There is NO place called 'Palestine' that is governed by 1 single, internationally recognized, entity. Do they mean 'Gaza' run by Hamas, an internationally recognized terrorist organization or do they mean Palestinian Authority's rule over the West Bank?
As for its 'right to defend itself' against Israel - who started this latest round of shit? 'Palestine' or the State of Israel.
What if Israel actually, formally, declared 'War' against this 'Palestine' and conquered it and decided to rule it in the same many as what the Allies did to Germany and/or Japan after WWII, then what? Would the rest of the world stfu? War's over, they wanted it, we formally declared it, conquered the territory, signed the formal ending of the war. Case closed.
Quirky
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,649
- Points
- 1,260
It's all political theater for votes, means nothing on the battlefield and the conditions in gaza won't change.
Colin Parkinson
Army.ca Myth
- Reaction score
- 11,914
- Points
- 1,160
More Hamas Leadership taken out
- Reaction score
- 1,852
- Points
- 1,260
Have to wonder if the end game for Israel is to kill off enough of Hamas so that they can bring over PA from the West Bank to re-establish effective control and then allow for a controlled re-build to occur. The old 'devil you can work with' vs the one that you'd rather kill off.
Colin Parkinson
Army.ca Myth
- Reaction score
- 11,914
- Points
- 1,160
Tom Nash indicates that the Israelis are looking into "Cantons" each ruled by a different family in Gaza and are currently using those family structures to deliver aid in the areas the IDF controls. This is preferable to the PA who are generally to corrupt and disliked by many Palestinians.
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 32,198
- Points
- 1,160
- Reaction score
- 2,075
- Points
- 1,160
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 32,198
- Points
- 1,160
The amended motion is pretty weak though and, once again, proves that the Liberals are being led around by the nose by the NDP:
TacticalTea
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,485
- Points
- 1,160
He's gosh darn right, and it pisses me off to see the Bloc once again vote with the government. What's the point of such a party, one might ask.
Props to Housefather - who has often been the voice of reason since Oct 7-, Mendicino, and Carr.
The motion may be diluted, but it still whitewashes terroristic propaganda by incensing the absurd Hamas-provided death toll. It also ensures continued funding of UNRWA while suspending arms export to Israel? Literally fund the terrorists while we cut off our single ally in the region!
Canada is a far cry from the country I pledged to serve a decade ago.
OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 15,531
- Points
- 1,260
I was thinking the same - did we - and when I say "we" I mean the current GoC - the sacrifice we made during WW2? The Holocaust?
It seems so.
Similar threads
