FWIW, administration of justice (including law enforcement) remains the constitutional responsibility of the province. Also, municipalities do not exercise operational control over police services. The police services are arms length from the municipal (and provincial) governments. It’s reasonable to look first to senior police leadership in any given jurisdiction for why something happened or didn’t).
Yup. When it came time for Windsor Police to actually execute a plan, they did so and they had help. OPP and RCMP were also present and helping with the public order response. They saw the issue and they acted.
Which is why my earlier nite about Windsor referred to Windsor (WPS was assumed, I had explicitly noted WPS previously, but should have included it explicitly in my list recent post), with assistance as required/requested of the Province.
OPS clearly had some internal issues, but I would also note that it would be naive for people to believe that the factor added by the PM’s and other higher levels of government, didn’t make the OPS’ task particularly less difficult.
Quebec will say no because someone else said yes.You're probably correct, Quebec would be against losing any bit of territory (unless they were compensated somehow).
I was not impressed with the Ottawa chief - the one that got fired.Yup. When it came time for Windsor Police to actually execute a plan, they did so and they had help. OPP and RCMP were also present and helping with the public order response. They saw the issue and they acted.
Him and every single elected member of council.I was not impressed with the Ottawa chief - the one that got fired.
Nobody was.I was not impressed with the Ottawa chief - the one that got fired.
I always got the impression he was in over his head and did not have the sense to realize it. Plus the briefs always sounded like the OPS was taking Juno Beach again.Nobody was.
Apparently he wrote something recently explaining his (in)actions. I need to find it.
I can’t and haven’t spoken to anything close to all of it- just that there was no lack of enforcement authorities. From the moment the first car blocked the first street, police had all necessary legal authority to physically remove it and to charge the driver. The situation escalated to criminal mischief very quickly, but police were super lenient in enforcing this.I’m watching this stuff because I still don’t understand- beyond the banking stuff how this couldn’t have been dealt with without this EA stuff. I think Brihard tried explaining it and I didn’t get it then either- he knows much better than I do.
I only know the stuff I’ve done that didn’t need expanded authorities. Maybe I’ll do some googling.
That’s my mistake then. I apologize. I assumed there was a nuance I wasn’t tracking and I thought you had said something.I can’t and haven’t spoken to anything close to all of it- just that there was no lack of enforcement authorities. From the moment the first car blocked the first street, police had all necessary legal authority to physically remove it and to charge the driver. The situation escalated to criminal mischief very quickly, but police were super lenient in enforcing this.
The emergencies act allowed for other things, particularly financial ‘sanctions’, for lack of a better term, and compelling banks to act against the accounts of those they could identify as being involved. Much more savvy people than I are spending a lot of time looking at that. Jess Marin Davis is a good security analyst to follow on this matter.
I don’t know what the reality of the situation was in terms of trying to procure tow services, or how critical the EA was to essentially conscript towing capacity. In the end, most of the trucks turned and ran at the eleventh hour and fifty ninth minute - I remember nervously watching some start up and wondering if they were going to drive at us or back away - but the sudden caving of most of the parked truck drivers could not have been predicted or relied upon. I don’t know if the necessary kit and capabilities could have been brought to bear otherwise, except for calling in CAF for its wreckers. CAF aid to civil power vs EA to compel tow services is an ugly optics dilemma I wouldn’t personally want to have to contend with. Given the now proven utility of parked trucks as acts of criminal mischief in the course of a disruptive protest, I think it would be wise for the province and some of the cities to quietly maintain a modest inventory of heavy wreckers.
There will be a lot of wrangling and gnashing of teeth over how much information regarding the Emergencies Act decision is shared; how; when; and in which forum. I don’t know enough at present to be able to give an informed take on what information should be public and what should not. And of course, we know some of what we don’t know (E.g., without a doubt there was security intelligence informing the response, but we don’t know what), and there’s also ‘don’t know’ that we don’t know we don’t know. Most of it will eventually come out in the wash, I expect. I’m sure everyone with strong feelings on the matter will have their minds made up in time for the next election.
Yes, mischief, S.430 Criminal Code. Quite a lot of people are presently before the courts charged with exactly that offence arising out of the convoy protests. Most of the cases were not held for bail, so they’re still a long way from any meaningful court action, which means those of you playing from home won’t have heard of them yet- but there are quite a number of those files, and crown’s moving forward with prosecution. You could probably benefit from a bit more familiarity with basic criminal offences and the elements thereof.“Criminal mischief, criminal mischief”
“If you repeat it, if you say it louder, if that’s your talking point, people will totally believe it!”
Even the judge ruling on the honking said the peaceful protests could continue. Protests are meant to be inconvenient. The upper crust of downtown Ottawa and the mandarins working there aren’t used to being inconvenienced like that and were likely shocked and highly offended to see the level of support against the mandates etc.
Nice try.Even the judge ruling on the honking said the peaceful protests could continue. Protests are meant to be inconvenient. The upper crust of downtown Ottawa and the mandarins working there aren’t used to being inconvenienced like that and were likely shocked and highly offended to see the level of support against the mandates etc.
I live in downtown Ottawa. I'm a junior officer. There is a halfway house a block from me, and a bunch of low-income housing a few blocks away. Downtown Bank street (not far from me) is not full of "upper crust" folks.The upper crust of downtown Ottawa and the mandarins working there aren’t used to being inconvenienced like that and were likely shocked and highly offended to see the level of support against the mandates etc.
Like new city officials and police?I hope the class action suit gives everyone everything they deserve.
We already have a new chief and by all accounts he’s much better than the last one.Like new city officials and police?
Probably a bigger chance of those 20 defendants handing over $306M plus interest plus legal costs.