• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sharpey
  • Start date Start date
MarkOttawa said:
Is split buy with Super Hornet for nuke role still a possibility (USN SH-s have no nuclear capability)? What about risk to FCAS next-gen fighter program with France/Airbus if don't go all Typhoon?

Mark
Ottawa

Just a random thought/wild speculation on my part.  Presumably the new Franco-German fighter will be certified by the French to drop their own nuclear bombs.  In light of the USA's cooler relations with some of it's allies, would it be totally outside the realm of possibility for the Germans to strike an agreement with the French to use their nuclear bombs in case of conflict with Russia instead of American bombs? 

That would get rid of the US certification requirement, lessen the reliance on a seemingly waivering and distant US for deterrence and strengthen the Franco-German defence alliance.  Big question is how much trust do the French and Germans REALLY have in each other?  Enough for the French to share their nuclear weapons and enough for the Germans to trust the French to defend them?

I don't really see this happening, but an interesting thought in these changing times.
 
CBH99 said:
I know I asked this once before, a while back in a different thread...but just to confirm...

What makes an aircraft capable of fulfilling the nuclear mission, or not being able to fulfill that mission, is simply a matter of software - am I correct?


Because most jets fly high enough & fast enough that escaping the immediate effects of a nuclear blast are pretty much uniform, regardless of the airframe.  It's the software that dictates whether the nuclear weapon can be armed/released?

this sort of stuff  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPTnmZ_HPAs
 
GR66:

would it be totally outside the realm of possibility for the Germans to strike an agreement with the French to use their nuclear bombs in case of conflict with Russia instead of American bombs?

The idea of French/German nuke cooperation has been discussed quite a bit recently--from 2017:

Double Down on Developing Europe
France and Germany must fix Europe, beginning with five key areas...

First, gradually combining the armies of Germany and France until they are fully integrated. This is how France and Germany must counter stagnating efforts to deepen cooperation among armed forces throughout Europe. Yes, it would mean a joint supreme command and foreign deployments, but there would also be savings on weapons systems and shared responsibility for French nuclear weapons [emphasis added]...
https://www.handelsblatt.com/today/opinion/eu-evolution-double-down-on-developing-europe/23572756.html

More:
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&client=firefox-b&biw=1067&bih=505&ei=VZBTXInoJuHZxgPS9KjwCA&q=germany+france+%22nuclear+weapons%22&oq=germany+france+%22nuclear+weapons%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i22i30.25351.28612..29229...0.0..0.130.232.0j2......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71j0i30j0i8i30.qNb1dV1Kvpo

But FCAS is some two decades away I would think, so...

Mark
Ottawa
 
While certainly possible, I don't know how prudent it would be for the Germans to plan ahead expecting to be integrated with the French nuclear arsenal?

Realistically, the only countries that will potentially use nuclear weapons on another country are the USA, Russia, and China.  I trulyu don't see France nuking anybody anytime soon.


As for using French nuclear weapons against Russia?  Russia isn't invading Europe anytime soon.  Europe pays most of Russia's bills via it's purchase of Russian natural gas & cross-border exchanges of grocery labels.  Without Europe buying oil & gas from Russia, Russia's economy loses one of the very few key pillars it still has.

 
CBH99 said:
While certainly possible, I don't know how prudent it would be for the Germans to plan ahead expecting to be integrated with the French nuclear arsenal?

Realistically, the only countries that will potentially use nuclear weapons on another country are the USA, Russia, and China and Pakistan, India, Isreal, North Korea, and potentially/eventually Iran and Saudi Arabia.  I trulyu don't see France nuking anybody anytime soon.


As for using French nuclear weapons against Russia?  Russia isn't invading Europe anytime soon.  Europe pays most of Russia's bills via it's purchase of Russian natural gas & cross-border exchanges of grocery labels.  Without Europe buying oil & gas from Russia, Russia's economy loses one of the very few key pillars it still has.

FTFY
 
Personal belief of a nasty, cynical Brit:

French nuclear weapons were intended to be detonated over Germany just before the Russians crossed the Rhine into Strasbourg.

No way France is going to detonate nukes over Moscow to defend Warsaw.
 
May 1939, "Mourir pour Dantzig?":

Dantzig-730cf.jpg


More:

dantzig.png

https://www.herodote.net/4_mai_1939-evenement-19390504.php

Mark
Ottawa
 
Chris Pook said:
Personal belief of a nasty, cynical Brit:

French nuclear weapons were intended to be detonated over Germany just before the Russians crossed the Rhine into Strasbourg.

No way France is going to detonate nukes over Moscow to defend Warsaw.

Agreed, but would they detonate nukes over Western Poland to defend Berlin?
 
Put to the Test: The Advanced F-15 is ready for the fight

Advanced F-15 completes flight tests in Palmdale, California.


A combined U.S. Air Force and Boeing flight test team just wrapped up nearly five years of rigorous testing on the Advanced F-15.  They tested the aircraft’s systems and flight controls in Palmdale, Calif. More than 15,000 test points were covered to assure safety, quality and performance.

“Take my word, it’s not your father’s F-15,” said Matt Giese, Boeing Test & Evaluation chief F-15 test pilot. “This jet has capabilities like we’ve never seen before.”

Capabilities like a fly-by-wire control system for greater maneuverability and angles of attack; arguably the world’s fastest fighter mission computer able to process 87-billion instructions per second; and expanded weapons carriage that can bring up to 12 missiles and assorted munitions on a single aircraft into the fight.

"Integrating advanced technologies has made this unbeaten platform contemporary and future ready,” said Prat Kumar, vice president and program manager, Boeing F-15 programs. “The Advanced F-15 remains ahead of threats now and into the future making the Eagle an enduring attack air platform.”

http://www.boeing.com/features/2019/01/advanced-f15-test-01-19.page

https://www.facebook.com/Boeing/videos/vb.115537125141500/239076200338046

https://twitter.com/BoeingDefense/status/1091345490040492033

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaK_uSeCJgg
 
Teething, teething:

DOT&E delivers another scathing report on F-35 progress
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/dote-delivers-another-scathing-report-on-f-35-progr-455483/?

DOT&E highlights weaknesses in US Navy EW system testing
https://www.janes.com/article/86117/dot-e-highlights-weaknesses-in-us-navy-ew-system-testing

Bad data in F-35 logistics system [ALIS] resulting in lost missions
https://www.defensenews.com/air/2019/02/01/bad-data-in-f-35-logistics-system-resulting-in-lost-missions/

Nice that if the RCAF eventually gets will be quite a few years down the road. Very convenient in terms of the report--and also a lot cheaper. However in the meantime as pilots and other seem to be flying the coop...

Mark
Ottawa
 
This Aircraft recommended by Supersonic Max :

Re: The RCAF's Next Generation Fighter (CF-188 Replacement)
« Reply #2380 on: December 22, 2018, 20:47:29 »
Quote
The F-15E (or one of its upgraded versions) has always been my #1 choice.  Long legs, lots of weapons, good EA/EP.  Good for both NORAD and NATO.




 
Baden Guy:

We were there the first day in Kosovo and would have been in Libya and Iraq if we had been positioned closer sooner

Not exactly peer, near peer, adversaries. Even for Canada at the relevant time.

Mark
Ottawa
 
Article from the Arizona Republic

https://arizonarepublic-az.newsmemory.com/?token=809e2e2be0db26dc8e751cf46c9e3f03&cnum=3952677&fod=1111111-0&selDate=20190202&licenseType=paid_subscriber&

Luke feels effects of national pilot shortage - 1 Feb 19

Luke Air Force Base is feeling the effects of a national personnel shortage that has left the Air Force without enough pilots, maintenance crew and support staff to fully power U.S. military needs.

“Right now, we don’t have enough of certain types of pilots to actually account for all the jobs that we need to do in the Air Force,” said Maj. William Andreotta, operations director for Luke’s 56th Training Squadron. “Those can be anything from here in the front line of actually flying the aircraft all the way to staff jobs that require pilot knowledge as a background to be able to do the job.”

The Air Force is trying to make training more efficient, and programs around the state are playing their part by building passion in high schoolers, teaching them the intricacies needed to become a pilot, mechanic or air-traffic controller.

As of September, the Air Force had unfilled positions for 1,500 pilots. At Luke, a training base, the shortage of instructors to train fighter pilots to fly F-16 and F-35 fighter jets is particularly acute. Pilots have tough work lives, and those undergoing training often leave to pursue a better balance between work and family life, leaders said. Luke spokesman Jensen Stidham said that as of September, there were 58 instructor pilots, leaving 26 open positions for F-16 pilots. For F-35s, only 85 out of 101 instructor-pilot positions were filled.

A backlog of aircraft mechanics also has led to a decrease in available aircraft, which leads into a continuing loop: the number of pilots that can train depends on the number of aircraft available.

Andreotta said the Air Force is trying to solve the problem partly by making training more efficient. “Where we can decrease the course length but not decrease the quality of the product that we’re sending out there, so that’s how we produce more (pilots),' he said. Air Force officials say their goal is to have most positions manned at 95 percent by 2024. But that will be tougher for fighter pilots: the 95 percent goal is set for 2029.

Another way to build the fighter pilot force is to educate high schoolers. In Tucson, high school students are learning what it takes to build a kit airplane through Southern Arizona Teen Aviation, a non-profit organization. They're building a two-seat Van’s Aircraft RV12 and will fly it, according to the group’s website. The students are involved in building all parts of the single-engine airplane, the website says. The experience gives the students skills to pursue careers ranging from pilot to aircraft mechanic. “We’re trying to give the kids an opportunity to get their hands on an airplane, see what an airplane’s like, fly on an airplane, work with an airplane, build an airplane,” co-founder Alan Muhs said.

At Phoenix’s South Mountain High School, senior Jaja Obasi enrolled in his school’s aerospace program. According to the school’s website, students enrolled in the program learn aviation fields like aircraft maintenance and air-traffic control and can work towards earning their private-pilot certificate from the Federal Aviation Administration. Obasi said he loves aviation and that he wants to become a pilot. “Then just getting up in the air, that feeling that you get in your stomach,” he said.

Besides the instructor shortage, Luke is also not up to full strength on mechanics, which affects training availability.
 

Attachments

  • Luke.JPG
    Luke.JPG
    142.5 KB · Views: 151
More often you see a flight of two. A formation of four is fairly normal. Daily, Mon to Fri. Last week, driving down Bell Rd (the main drag), a F-35 was flying low and slow IFR (I Follow Roads) West to East above the road. I was driving so could not get a photo. We had a sonic boom from a distance last month. Shook the windows where we live, West of Surprise.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/glendale/2019/02/05/glendale-arizona-luke-air-force-base-f-35-program-grows-noise-grows/2778033002/

Here's why the skies around Luke Air Force Base are getting noisier
- 5 Feb 19

As skies around Luke Air Force Base get busier and noisier, the base wants West Valley (Phoenix) residents who live nearby to know that this is the new norm. The base's F-35 program is growing, as planned. With more planes and more pilots to train, there's more training flights each day, and the time between flights — and noise from an overhead plane — is shrinking.

The base hit a milestone in January. For the first time, there were more than 1,000 F-35 flights from the base in one month, said Becky Heyse, a base spokeswoman.

Also last month, the base saw a dramatic increase in noise complaints from those living around the base, Heyse said. She declined to provide the number of complaints in January. In all of 2018, there were about 80, according to numbers provided by Luke near the end of the year. The number of complaints coming in so far this month seem more normal, Heyse said.

But the number of flights, and the noise, will continue to grow as the program grows. Luke officials are asking residents for their continued support, Heyse said. "The program has been as successful as it has been because we have this community support," she said.(That's True. When the USAF was analyzing where to place the F-35 program, the community overwhelmingly  supported Luke AFB. A few dissented, and where told you know where your residence was when you purchased it. )

Five years into F-35 program

Luke is located north of Camelback Road and west of Litchfield Road in west Glendale (City in NW Phoenix). It was a mainstay for F-16s during that jet's heyday.

Becky Heyse, Luke Air Force Base spokeswoman, on the base's F-35 program: “The program has been as successful as it has been because we have this community support.”

The base is now phasing out its F-16 program as its F-35 program grows. In the last few months, it reached another milestone: The number of F-35s surpassed the number of F-16s on base. After receiving its first F-35 in 2014, the base is now up to 85 F-35s. The plan is to build out the inventory to a total of 144 F-35s. The base has 77 F-16s after dropping from a peak of more than 200.

Luke trains pilots from around the world, and, in total, trains 70 percent of the world's F-35 pilots. The pilots are trained on planes from all of the F-35 partner countries, which are the U.S., (Norwegians since Nov 15) Australia, Norway, Italy, Turkey and the Netherlands. The base is also training pilots from the Republic of Korea. On Friday, it received its first Dutch F-35, Heyse said. The base graduates about 105 F-35 pilots per year, and about 98 F-35 maintainers per year, according to November data provided by Luke. Luke, along with the rest of the U.S. Air Force, faces a shortage in pilots and pilot instructors.

Noise doesn't bother some


Surprise (City in NW Phoenix) Councilman Chris Judd, who has lived near the base for about 15 years, said he hasn't noticed an increase in flights lately. He said noise from the flights is "just part of living" in his district. F-35s are louder than the F-16s that long-time residents may have been used to.

Luke officials aren't sure why complaints jumped last month, but they have their guesses, Heyse said. It was colder, and planes sound louder when it's cold. The base shut down one of two runways for construction in January, which may have changed what certain residents heard. And there weren't as many flights taking place in December during the holidays, so in January residents may have been more inclined to notice when flights picked back up again. Judd said his neighbors don't complain to him about the noise. In fact, he said, complaining about it is "almost socially unacceptable."

It's common in the communities around Luke to refer to it as the sound of freedom. (That's True)

 

Attachments

  • Luke AFB.JPG
    Luke AFB.JPG
    168.5 KB · Views: 143
Closing in on that big block buy at very reasonable price for F-35A:

DoD to begin negotiations to buy 485 Lockheed Martin F-35s
The F-35 Lightning II Joint Program Office intends to solicit and negotiate multiple contracts to buy 485 stealth fighters from Lockheed Martin.

The negotiations are for aircraft to be built as part of production Lots 15, 16 and 17, the Department of Defense office said in a notice posted online 13 February announcing its intent to begin bargaining. The contracts would provide for long lead time materials, parts, components, initial spares, and labour, as well as production and testing equipment.

The anticipated award date is in the third quarter of calendar year 2021, the Pentagon says. The notice did not disclose costs and the Joint Programme Office said it wouldn’t speculate about prices during negotiations, though it expects the price of the F-35A to fall.

We are committed to having a less than $80 million F-35A by 2020 [emphasis added],” says the office.

Lot 15 would include 116 F-35As, 29 F-35Bs, and 24 F-35Cs; a total of 169 aircraft.

Lot 16 would include 101 F-35As, 32 F-35Bs, 24 F-35Cs; a total of 157 aircraft.

Lot 17 would include 98 F-35As, 37 F-35Bs, and 24 F-35Cs; a total of 159 aircraft.

The notice did not break down individual customers. However, the Joint Program Office gave a broad summary of the possible order. The US Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps would together acquire 295 aircraft; development partners would acquire 143 aircraft; and foreign military sales would account for the remaining 47 aircraft. No new F-35 customers are included in the potential order [emphasis added].

Development partners and foreign military sales would be a mix of F-35A and F-35B variants, though the Joint Program Office declines to elaborate further on the US services' order.

The Joint Program Office says its intent is to make Lots 15, 16 and 17 part of a multiyear contract, pending Congressional approval. A multiyear contract is a special agreement with the permission of the US Congress that would provide for a cancellation payment to be made to Lockheed Martin if appropriations are not made as promised [emphasis added]. In return for a stronger guarantee of business, Lockheed Martin can then go forward to negotiate bulk discounts for materials and parts, passing back some savings to the Defense Department.

Lockheed Martin said it has delivered more than 360 aircraft as of 1 February. Most recently, on 30 January, the company celebrated the rollout of the first operational F-35A for the Royal Netherlands Air Force.

As production ramps and additional improvements are implemented, Lockheed Martin says its goal is to reduce the cost of an F-35A to $80 million by 2020. Deliveries for Lot 11 began in 2019, with the cost of the F-35A set at $89.2 million per example [emphasis added].
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/dod-to-begin-negotiations-to-buy-485-lockheed-martin-455793/

Mark
Ottawa
 
https://theaviationist.com/2019/02/16/the-first-reports-of-how-the-f-35-strutted-its-stuff-in-dogfights-against-aggressors-at-red-flag-are-starting-to-emerge/#disqus_thread

The First Reports Of How The F-35 Strutted Its Stuff In Dogfights Against Aggressors At Red Flag Are Starting To Emerge
- 16 Feb 19
    Red Flag 19-1 has just come to an end and, based on official reports, once again the F-35 held its own against the Aggressors

You may probably remember what happened in 2017, when the first F-35A jets, belonging to the 388th and 419th Fighter Wings at Hill AFB, Utah, deployed to Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, to take part in the type’s first Red Flag exercise. During that iteration, designated RF 17-1, the U.S. Air Force F-35A Lightning II, who had just been declared IOC (Initial Operational Capable) achieved a resounding score in mock aerial engagements against Aggressors: while early reports suggested a 15-1 kill ratio a subsequent Air Force testimony by Lt. Gen. Jerry D. Harris, Vice Commander of Air Combat Command characterized the kill ratio as “20-1” meaning that, for one F-35A “lost” in simulated combat in a high threat environment that the aircraft destroyed 20 simulated enemy aircraft.

This is what we wrote about the impressive F-35 performance:

Three words summarize the role of the F-35A during this Red Flag exercise; stealth, integration and flexibility. To a greater degree than any previous aircraft in U.S. Air Force history the F-35A Lightning IIs from Hill AFB acted as sensors, guidance platforms and strike assets almost simultaneously, and they did so in a threat environment that would have been previously impenetrable without significantly greater loses. They also performed in an air-to-air role: although we don’t know the ROE (Rules of Engagement) in place for the drills nor the exact role played by the F-22 Raptors that teamed up with the Lightning II throughout the exercise, the results achieved by the F-35, appear to be impressive, especially considering the 5th Gen. aircraft’s additional tasking during RF.

Indeed, while early reports suggested a 15-1 kill ratio recent Air Force testimony by Lt. Gen. Jerry D. Harris, Vice Commander of Air Combat Command characterized the kill ratio as “20-1” meaning that, for one F-35A “lost” in simulated combat in a high threat environment that the aircraft destroyed 20 simulated enemy aircraft belonging to the “Red Force”.

Two years later, with the subsequent Block 3F software upgrade available that provides 100 percent of the software required for full warfighting capability, the F-35s have once again put their skills to test as part of the “Blue Force” at the Air Force’s premier air combat exercise held at Nellis AFB: an “exponentially more challenging” Red Flag, according to the airmen from the 388th Fighter Wing’s 4th Fighter Squadron. The squadron brought 12 aircraft and more than 200 Airmen to the three-week exercise – pilots, maintainers, intelligence officers, weapons crews, and support personnel, including reservists from the 419th Fighter Wing.

The three-week exercise has just come to an end. However, as expected, some initial details about the results achieved by the F-35s have started to emerge in public statements and news releases. “The first time I came to Red Flag in 2004, our tactics were the same as they had been since the early 1980s. Now, the threat and complexity are at a whole different level,” said Col. Joshua Wood, 388th Operations Group commander, in a 388th FW Public Affairs article. “It’s no longer assumed that we will gain and maintain air superiority. That’s a big shift.”

We have provided details about what taking part in a RF means to an airman and how this exercise has changed throughout the years in this past article written by a pilot who went twice to Red Flag. Here’s an excerpt:

In 2002 we had a well-defined set up, we knew where the enemy was, how it would react to our presence, where the threats were located etc.; in 2010, we faced a “border line” scenario with enemy elements embedded in friendly forces or civilian population, where CDE (Collateral Damage Estimation) was extremely important, where target VID (Visual IDentification) or EOID (Electro Optical IDentification) were the main success factors in the simulated air campaign. In other words, 8 years apart, the RF scenario had evolved to adapt to the ever-changing “combat environment.”

The most recent RFs prove that the exercise continues to change. For instance, while maintaining the standard coalitions scheme (Blue and Red forces), RF 17-1 had the two teams involved in a “crisis” instead of a war situation. On top of that, not only does the scenario has introduced the latest and most sophisticated and capable threats that require a change in tactics, but it has also moved on a higher level, focusing on the importance of  “battlefield information management,” a kind of task the much debated F-35 is going to master.

Today, taking part in a RF means joining pilots, ground forces, intelligence analysts, cyber and space operators, for testing and training operations at Nellis as well as the Nevada Test and Training Range north of Las Vegas. All the participants have only one goal in mind: working together to FITS “Find, Identify, Track and Strike” the adversary, to attack forces in a multi-domain battlefield which is based on what we have encountered so far in theater and what we may expect to find in the future wars. This is the real core business and the big change of the most recent RFs.

A RF mission is usually made of 20-25 adversaries: not only aircraft, but also ground-to-air threats, moving and unknown threats etc. In other words, the old fixed scenario has become much more “dynamic” requiring a real-time “combat battlefield” coordinator. Therefore, the most recent RF scenarios aim to develop the ability to fuse all the combat capabilities. In this context, the F-35 brings to the package the ability to penetrate deep into the most complex and “unknown” environments providing the “overall control” of the battlefield. The F-35, as well as any other modern aircraft with similar sensor fusing ability, can also work in a complementary fashion with the 4th generation fighters, sharing the information with all the other “players” while providing its own amount of fire power to the team.

Stealth technology (capability to survive and operate effectively where others cannot) combined with 5th generation features (i.e. superior information management), were pivotal to achieve the overall RF’s mini-campaign results.


Therefore, Red Flag keep changing, and F-35s play an important role in missions flown in “contested or denied” environments with active electronic attack, communications jamming, and GPS denial. “Those situations highlight the fifth-generation capabilities of the F-35. We’re still able to operate and be successful. In a lot of cases we have a large role as an integrated quarterback,” said Lt. Col. Yosef Morris, 4th Fighter Squadron commander. “Our ability to continue to fuse and pass information to the entire package makes every aircraft more survivable.” Indeed, we have often explained how the role of the F-35 is the one of the “combat battlefield” coordinator that can collect, manage and distribute intelligence data, while attacking targets: when they have expended all their ordnance, Lightning II pilots can support the rest of the team by collecting live battlefield data and passing it to older 4th generation fighters via Link-16. According to the airmen of the 388th FW, during the first week of RF 19-1, the F-35 pilots flew in a larger force of Blue Air in a counter-air mission. More than 60 aggressor aircraft were flying against them, blinding many of the fourth-generation aircraft with “robust” electronic attack capabilities.

Here’s how Col. Joshua Wood recalled the mission, providing a few details about the performance of the stealth aircraft in the latest exercise (that saw the participation of thirteen pilots in the squadron who had never flown the F-35 in Red Flag, including four who had just graduated pilot training):

“I’ve never seen anything like it before. This is not a mission you want a young pilot flying in. My wingman was a brand new F-35A pilot, seven or eight flights out of training. He gets on the radio and tells an experienced, 3,000-hour pilot in a very capable fourth-generation aircraft. ‘Hey bud, you need to turn around. You’re about to die. There’s a threat off your nose.’” The young pilot then “killed” the enemy aircraft and had three more kills in the hour-long mission. “Even in this extremely challenging environment, the F-35 didn’t have many difficulties doing its job, that’s a testament to the pilot’s training and the capabilities of the jet.”

Therefore, Wood did not provide specific details about the type’s overall kill ratio against the Red Air, but at least we know a young pilot, with just a few missions in the Lightning II, achieved four (simulated) kills in a RF mission: whatever the ROE (Rules Of Engagement) and the role of other aircraft teaming with the F-35s, it’s an interesting result, suggesting the aircraft can be lethal even in the hands of recently graduated pilots.

“With stealth, the F-35 can get closer to threats than many other aircraft can. Combined with the performance of the fused sensors on the F-35, we can significantly contribute to the majority of the missions. As this aircraft matures, we continue to see it be a significant force-multiplier in a threat-dense environment. Red Flag was a success for us and has made our younger pilots more lethal and more confident,” 1st Lt. Landon Morris, a new F-35A pilot said.

Most probably, more details will be made public in the next weeks, so stay tuned for some more analysis and coverage!

Photo Caption:

An F-35A Lightning II pilot from the 388th Fighter Wing’s 4th Fighter Squadron prepares to launch during Red Flag 19-1, Nelllis Air Force Base, Nev., Feb. 6, 2019. Pilots and maintainers from the 388th Fighter Wing’s 4th Fighter Squadron and 4th Aircraft Maintenance Unit are participating in Red Flag 19-1 at Nellis AFB, Nevada. This is the wing’s second Red Flag with the F-35A, America’s most advanced multi-role fighter, which brings game-changing stealth, lethality and interoperability to the modern battlefield. Red Flag is the Air Force’s premier combat exercise and includes units from across the Air Force and allied nations. The 388th is the lead wing for Red Flag 19-1. (U.S. Air Force photo by R. Nial Bradshaw)
 

Attachments

  • F-35-RF-19-1-pilot-close-up.jpg
    F-35-RF-19-1-pilot-close-up.jpg
    102.3 KB · Views: 157
But that's the name of a Navy/Marines fighter ( http://www.aviation-history.com/grumman/f9f.html )! Will their pilots adopt it too? Anyway, shades of the "Viper"!

The F-35’s New, Much Better Nickname is “Panther”
Nobody likes the F-35’s real name. Nobody.

Some of the best defense news in weeks—or maybe even months—is that U.S. Air Force pilots have nicknamed the F-35A fighter the “Panther.” This follows a long history of American warplanes receiving nicknames that become much more popular than their official names, and is a nice switchup from the plane’s poorly received official name “Lightning II.”

According to The War Zone U.S. Air Force pilots at Nellis Air Force Base refer to the F-35A as the “Panther.” The article features a patch from the service’s 6th Weapons Squadron with the words “Panther Tamer”, referring to the F-35A. Of course, everyone knows the official name of the F-35A is the Lightning II, but at Nellis it’s “Panther.”

One of the most understated problems with the F-35—a plane with many problems—is the name. The F-35 was named after not one but two planes: the Lockheed P-38 Lightning fighter of World War II, and the English Electric Lightning jet fighter of the Cold War. Like the F-35, the fork-tailed P-38 was also built by Lockheed Martin, and the United Kingdom would be one of the largest overseas customer of the Joint Strike Fighter.

The resulting name, “Lightning Two” is a nice gesture to history, but it’s also deeply unpopular. Nobody other than the Pentagon uses it. Reporters writing about the F-35 often go entire articles without using the name, preferring F-35 or the older "Joint Strike Fighter." Many people with a casual interest in the F-35 may not even be aware of the official name.

Why is it unpopular? For one, the name is too long. The best warplane names are short and sweet: Sabre and Viper are examples. A nice cadence can make a longer name, like Tornado or Phantom, roll more easily off the tongue. A long but mighty name like Strike Eagle can force acceptance from sheer coolness. Lightning Two has none of these qualities.

Another reason Lightning Two is so disliked is because it is a sequel name. People dislike sequels, which are often uninspiring messes piggybacking off the popularity of the original. Many outside observers would have said the same thing about the F-35 in the late 2000s, and some would still say so now. Original names fare much better: the F-22 Raptor is the first jet bearing the name Raptor and, for the sake of originality, hopefully the last for a very long time.

Fortunately, the pilots who fly any given planes ultimately get the final say. In the late 1970s, Air Force pilots flying the first F-16s became enamored of the show “Battlestar Galactica,” which featured “Viper” space fighters. The name stuck, and today nobody calls the F-16 by its real name, the Fighting Falcon...
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a20789594/the-f-35s-new-much-better-nickname-is-panther/

I was always rather partial to "Voodoo" myself--though would probably be banned today as insensitive cultural appropriation :tsktsk:

Mark
Ottawa

Mark
Ottawa
 
Singapore buying in, question is what mix (if mix it is) of F-35Bs and Cs:

Singapore to order four F-35s, with options for eight

Singapore plans to place a firm order for four Lockheed Martin F-35s, with options for an additional eight aircraft.

“We have announced our plans to replace our F-16s, which will face obsolescence post 2030, with the F-35s,” said defence minister Ng Eng Hen in a parliamentary speech.

“This will mean the RSAF fighter fleet will consist of F-35 and [Boeing] F-15SGs if plans come to fruition a decade or so from now [emphasis added].”

He added that Singapore will issue a letter of request for four aircraft and options for eight. He stressed that the US congress must approve the sale, but the deal has the blessings of the both President Donald Trump and the US Department of Defense.

“President Trump wrote to Prime Minister Lee last month, welcoming Singapore’s plans to acquire the F-35,” said Ng.

Ng made no mention of which variant Singapore will obtain, although the country is believed to be interested in the F-35B short take-off vertical landing (STOVL) variant [emphasis added]. He also did not say when the Republic of Singapore Air Force will receive the jets.

The remarks are consistent with Singapore defence ministry statement in January that said a “small number” of F-35s would be obtained for assessment purposes.

Singapore is set to become the first F-35 operator in Southeast Asia, and the fourth in Asia-Pacific after Australia, Japan, and South Korea. It will also become the first Southeast Asian air force equipped with a stealth aircraft.

Ng also tweeted a presentation slide of Singapore’s planned military equipment for “2030 and beyond.”

The F-35 and F-15SG were the only two fixed wing fighters displayed. Also included where the C-130 tactical transport and Fokker 50 maritime patrol aircraft.

Cirium Fleets Analyzer shows that Singapore has 10 C-130s in service – five C-130Hs, four KC-130Bs, and one KC-130H – with an average age of 45.8 years. Its five Fokker 50 MPAs have an average age of 24.6 years, and its four Fokker 50 transports are on average 25.8 years old.

Singapore has been tight-lipped about its plans for both fleets, but both will increasingly face obsolescence.

The graphic also shows the Airbus Helicopters H225M and CH-47F. In 2016 Singapore announced that the H225M will replace the RSAF’s AS332 Super Pumas, and the CH-47F its CH-47SDs.

getasset.aspx

[any CAF salivation in order?]
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/singapore-to-order-four-f-35s-with-options-for-eig-456243/

Mark
Ottawa

 
Back
Top