• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Explaining Canadian silence

3rd Herd

Army.ca Veteran
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
410
The Usual Disclaimer:
The side bar attachment of a larger article: Soldier-reporters rewrite the rules http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/Ideas/article/245204

Explaining Canadian silence

A Google search turned up only two blogs written by Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan. Why so few?

Numbers: Since 2001, some 15,000 Canadian troops have served in Afghanistan. Over 1 million American troops, by contrast, have rotated through Afghanistan and Iraq.

Security regulations: Canadian Forces’ blogs policy is strict. Military members, the policy states, are to “consult with their chain of command” before posting anything related to the Canadian Forces — “regardless of how innocuous the information may seem.”

Canadian Forces culture: “The American military is far more open than the Canadian military,” says Bob Bergen, who wrote his University of Calgary Ph.D thesis on the Canadian military’s management of the media during the Kosovo war. In 2006, Canadian soldier Matt Austin was ordered to shut down his blog in Afghanistan.
 
Perhaps the Star can answer its questions by looking inwards? Instead of decrying the coverage provided by serving members, it should be questioning the balance its own reporters and editors deliver.
 
Proof that MSM moniters us:
http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/UK-defence-ministry-outlines-blog-rules/2007/08/13/1186857399556.html

UK defence ministry outlines blog rules
"Britain's military said it merely wanted to make its rules on operational secrecy relevant to the internet age, but its new directive on the matter quickly ignited a debate on the web, illustrating the difficulty of policing soldiers' online activity..................."

"The order got little attention until it was posted on Thursday on an internet forum popular with military personnel called the British Army Rumor Service.

It appeared under the heading "the crackdown on personnel acting on the freedom of speech and thought has finally happened."

Message boards lit up with the news that blogging would be banned, and the order was quickly picked up by the British press.

The military found itself at pains to deny it was trying to silence its soldiers..........................."
 
ModlrMike said:
Instead of decrying the coverage provided by serving members, it should be questioning the balance its own reporters and editors deliver.

+1!

Now thats the truth isn't it!

I have ZERO tolerance and ZERO respect for the media period!


Wes
 
Back
Top