Electric Ian said:and the perception ( sometimes justified) that the Navy is beginning to take benefits from the members to put fuel in the tanks of the ships.
So am I???Pusser said:I'm curious to know what benefits have been taken away. It sounds to me that this could be a case of misconception more than reality. Our compensation and benefits package is defined by Treasury Board and the Navy cannot alter that.
Pusser said:I'm curious to know what benefits have been taken away. It sounds to me that this could be a case of misconception more than reality. Our compensation and benefits package is defined by Treasury Board and the Navy cannot alter that.
Pusser said:I'm curious to know what benefits have been taken away. It sounds to me that this could be a case of misconception more than reality. Our compensation and benefits package is defined by Treasury Board and the Navy cannot alter that.
Electric Ian said:The private sector is a completely viable alternative, you're treated the same out there in most respects, sometimes better.
PuckChaser said:And yet there's lots of people wanting INTO the CF. If you're not happy, release. Complaining that you don't get sea pay for not going to sea is insanity....
Pusser said:The loss of Severance Pay (which wasn't really a loss at all) was inevitable, once the Public Service bargained it away. Our pay and compensation is modelled on theirs, so without an offset, we had to be next. Frankly, I'm surprised we managed to hang onto as long as we did. If you think about it, a severance package is traditionally designed as compensation for a sudden loss of a job. What we were getting wasn't really severance pay in the traditional sense. It was more like a retirement bonus. Severance Pay actually still exists for more traditional circumstances (e.g. a force reduction plan where personnel are released involuntarily).
The idea that Sea Duty Allowance (SDA) is for standing duty watches is a myth. There are a number specific factors associated with service at sea (i.e. not necessarily service in ships) for which Treasury Board has approved SDA as compensation. Standing duty watches on board ship is not now, nor has it ever been, one of those specific factors. Standing duty watches is simply part of being posted to a ship, the same as standing duties in a host of other units across the CF.
Perhaps there has been a tightening of enforcement of policy and regulation, but it's hard to argue that there has been a significant loss of CF benefits and the Navy as one part of the CF has not been the driving force of any changes in this area.
PuckChaser said:And yet there's lots of people wanting INTO the CF. If you're not happy, release. Complaining that you don't get sea pay for not going to sea is insanity....
Chief Stoker said:I believe sea pay was originally to compensate personnel for the demands that service in a warship entail. Including living conditions and separation from families.
Chief Stoker said:I believe sea pay was originally to compensate personnel for the demands that service in a warship entail. Including living conditions and separation from families.
Where are you going with this? if you are posted to a ship in MLR, you are not posted to a sea going Unit; ergo, no SDA.Electric Ian said:Yeah, so using your ideology, if you're posted to a ship, you get sea pay.
mariomike said:For reference, perhaps this will be merged with,
Electrical Technician Navy ( E Tech is a Navy only trade. )
https://army.ca/forums/threads/108780.0
2 pages .