That's true, getting in other peoples media is hard. However, it's not impossible to get small nods such as the one I mentioned above.
Go read some foreign newspapers online, I only recently noticed it. Canada with all it's peace keeping clout is still pigeon holed into 'coaltion forces' or 'un peace keeping coaltion'. While other countries such as Britain and US seem to get honourable mentions, regardless of where the newspaper is published.
I still think the Canadian army needs all the attention it can get. It's hard selling our own military to our own citizens let alone beyond the border. US top brass speak highly of Canadian soldiers. (score!) And since I'm convinced this is why we are there, for the attention/experience why not go the full nine and deploy a large unit.
What changes? Is it impossible to deploy 10,000? I though the changes in the CF made this sort of thing more flexable. Hence the transformation (and a means to cut jobs and save money)
Go read some foreign newspapers online, I only recently noticed it. Canada with all it's peace keeping clout is still pigeon holed into 'coaltion forces' or 'un peace keeping coaltion'. While other countries such as Britain and US seem to get honourable mentions, regardless of where the newspaper is published.
I still think the Canadian army needs all the attention it can get. It's hard selling our own military to our own citizens let alone beyond the border. US top brass speak highly of Canadian soldiers. (score!) And since I'm convinced this is why we are there, for the attention/experience why not go the full nine and deploy a large unit.
Because 2000 troops is 1/3 to 1/4 of the entire Army's deployable forces. We could never, ever get 10 000 troops overseas at this time without some major changes in the CF.
What changes? Is it impossible to deploy 10,000? I though the changes in the CF made this sort of thing more flexable. Hence the transformation (and a means to cut jobs and save money)