Yeah, I hear our brothers have found themselves in possession of some surplus aircraft…Or we could buy them from Afghanistan...
Did you read the part about redefining universality of service? Making it job specific. And allowing injured people to be able to continue to serve. Looks good so far.Damn, that CPC veterans plan is fantastic. You can very clearly the the impact of feedback O’Toole was getting while MVA under Harper, and that he wasn’t in a position to have ‘platformed’. I recognize issues that were brought up with great specificity by veterans’ advocates during the last CPC government.
Until you're one of the 3 clerks in the entire country that can deploy or go to the field, so you're driven into the ground until you end up on the same list as everyone else. Drastically changing UoS is just a way to play a shell game with the overall numbers in the CAF, by refusing to release anyone.Did you read the part about redefining universality of service? Making it job specific. And allowing injured people to be able to continue to serve. Looks good so far.
If they put hard limits on retention in terms of numbers this might work but you're likely right all it's going to end up doing is making the fit people who are ready to a good amount of the work just do more of the work.Until you're one of the 3 clerks in the entire country that can deploy or go to the field, so you're driven into the ground until you end up on the same list as everyone else. Drastically changing UoS is just a way to play a shell game with the overall numbers in the CAF, by refusing to release anyone.
Rest of the policy looks fantastic, especially the MO being able to determine service disability numbers that VAC cannot overrule. Should be good to fix the current 24 month wait time the Liberals have instituted while they've been in charge of VAC.
Or maybe the broken infantry guy who still wants to serve can be remustered to a trade that can still employ him. There is potential. I see your point but I also see how the intent could work.Until you're one of the 3 clerks in the entire country that can deploy or go to the field, so you're driven into the ground until you end up on the same list as everyone else. Drastically changing UoS is just a way to play a shell game with the overall numbers in the CAF, by refusing to release anyone.
Rest of the policy looks fantastic, especially the MO being able to determine service disability numbers that VAC cannot overrule. Should be good to fix the current 24 month wait time the Liberals have instituted while they've been in charge of VAC.
Thanks for the insights. Curious about this bit in the CPC plan:Damn, that CPC veterans plan is fantastic. You can very clearly the the impact of feedback O’Toole was getting while MVA under Harper, and that he wasn’t in a position to have ‘platformed’. I recognize issues that were brought up with great specificity by veterans’ advocates during the last CPC government.
I thought the original intent was to have everyone able to access the pension-for-life option - did I misunderstand, is this a tweak in the platform, or was this what was on the table back then?Implementing the Lifelong Disability Benefit for moderately to severely injured veterans.
Does everybody have to be judged by infantry standards, even though they remain deployable? Is the UofS baseline standard so rigid that the CF is losing, or risking, otherwise good members who, in all reality can perform their trade, and possibly a wide array of trades, anywhere on the globe?
Admittedly I'm on the outside looking in, but have a good friend who is being released due to diabetes. Apparently (I don't know for certain) the issue is not the illness but, rather, the fact that the meds need refrigeration. He's with the RCAF.
A good friend of mine, pilot, was released for UoS. He received his medical decision after he landed from a combat mission in Irak…. Talk about a broken system.Easy now, that kind of logic is going to make the "every one is soldier first" crowd implode.
A good friend of mine, pilot, was released for UoS. He received his medical decision after he landed from a combat mission in Irak…. Talk about a broken system.
Exactly why UoS needs fixing. Releasing someone who will likely never need to hump 13kms in whatever time we decided back in WW1 to get to the front in a timely manner.I met a guy like that a few years ago.
A former SoF rotary wing pilot with about 10,000 hours, he was released because his knee wouldn't let him complete the 13km BFT (carrying 55lbs) without great pain.
I said "Dude, you exist so people like me don't HAVE to carry all that gear so far."
I helped steer him into some really well aligned civilian employment where, I'm happy to say, he's much more appreciated
That's ridiculous.A good friend of mine, pilot, was released for UoS. He received his medical decision after he landed from a combat mission in Irak…. Talk about a broken system.
I thought this already existed; I know of a few people that ended up on a PCAT but stayed in uniform at a terminal rank and finished out their careers.Think about it this way, we have a great many on the CSS side who get out due to UoS or retirement only to be hired as a civilian contractor. Why not just keep them in uniform? Sure Bloggins might not be able to deploy, but maybe he would make a damn good instructor at the vehicle school.