A
aesop081
Guest
Genetk44 said:I've been trying to figure out ...what does MSM stand for?
Main Stream Media
Genetk44 said:I've been trying to figure out ...what does MSM stand for?
3rd Herd said:The usual disclaimer:
Wed, July 25, 2007
Army plan to upgrade used tanks hits snag
No company in Canada can do the job quickly
By CP
OTTAWA — The Conservative government’s $200-million plan to refurbish almost half of the 100 surplus Leopard 2 tanks being purchased from the Dutch has hit a snag.
There’s currently no company in Canada capable of quickly improving up to 40 Leopard 2A4 armoured vehicles in order to meet the rigours and dangers of Afghanistan.
A former tank commander said a Canadian Forces shop facility in Montreal used to have the expertise to handle upgrades on the 60-tonne monsters, but retired Col. Chris Corrigan says it slipped away, especially when the army looked at scrapping the Leopards a few years ago.
“This isn’t rocket science, but given that we haven’t done it in a while it’s like ramping up anything,” said Corrigan, who spent 35 years in tanks and is now a member of the Royal Canadian Military Institute.
3rd Herd said:“Once you lose a capability, it’s tough to get it back. It would be like trying to build frigates again. This is example of the argument people will give your for maintaining a defence industrial base. A nation like Canada needs to be able to service its own armoured vehicles.”
George Wallace said:Unfortunately, some of us have seen the end product of 101 Workshop's craftsmanship.
This is a very telling statement and one that military planners should never forget.
George Wallace said:Unfortunately, some of us have seen the end product of 101 Workshop's craftsmanship.
This is a very telling statement and one that military planners should never forget.
George Wallace said:;D
No Names; No Pack Drill.
Please don't take 3rd Herd's last post out of context. My first line is in disagreement with Col Corrigan's assessment our past craftsmanship, while my second line is in agreement with his assessment on loosing capabilities. In both cases we should have the capabilities and craftsmen to maintain our equipment. Expensive propositions that past Governments of the land have allowed to slip away.
cameron said:Hopefully (I know it's a faint hope) this will be a lesson learnt to some of Canada's leaders and they'll think twice in the future before scrapping a particular capability.
Munich, August 2nd 2007
Krauss-Maffei Wegmann (KMW) has delivered the first of 20 main battle tanks LEOPARD 2 A6M CAN to the Canadian Forces. In the presence of the Canadian Ambassador to Germany, numerous high ranking officers and government representatives Stefan Krischik, Member of the KMW Board, handed over the key of the first LEOAPRD 2. Canada has leased from the German Army 20 latest state of the art main battle tank LEOAPRD 2 A6M with an integrated mine protection.
In the past weeks KMW has readapted those tanks in close cooperation with the Canadian Forces to a configuration that meets all requirements for the current missions. Among those is the installation of slat armor.
retiredgrunt45 said:Oh what a sexy beast baby!!
...
Red 6 said:I'm with retired grunt on this one Iron Duke. The Leo was always an awesome looking and performing tank. It's outstanding to see the Canadians getting a world class system and putting it into combat service.
Agreed. Takes the "bite" out of it. No less a dangerous cat, though.ironduke57 said:I think you misunderstood me. I like the Leo2-look (especially of the older A4 version with it´s Tiger1 touch). But the slat armor give´s it an ugly shopping cart look.
Regards,
ironduke57
Captain Sensible said:...
Hopefully you can help me: Königstiger is German for "Bengal Tiger", no?
...