It looks like we're moving down the armed drone (flight) path.I mean, we have several levels of UAVs - none able to drop, like you say. Wasn't sure if you meant we had none at all.
You see, we once again demonstrate being behind the times. We're dealing with a decades old Predator/Reaper like system requirement (actually it was a Predator we wanted when I was still serving some 15 years ago, until folks went all single source on the thing and dealt it comatose in procurement hell) when what we're really needing these days is significantly less expensive but greater quantities of loitering munitions which would not be an Air Force resource but an Army and Navy one.It looks like we're moving down the armed drone (flight) path.
You know, a couple of decades after everyone else as per SOP
Armed drones on the Canadian military horizon
The Canadian government appears to be moving closer to acquiring armed drones. According to Justin Ling of Vice News, Canadian government officials recently briefed industry partners on systems requirements, with long-range surveillance and the ability to engage targets remotely seen as key to protecting Canadian territory and participating in foreign missions. But questions about the policies guiding the use of drones by the Canadian military remain unanswered and deserve more attention from civil society and the Canadian public.
The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) first showed an interest in drones in 2000, with the start of the Joint Unmanned Surveillance and Target Acquisition System (JUSTAS) program. This plan met with internal and public opposition related to costs and disagreement on the best system.
For two years beginning in 2008, CAF personnel in Afghanistan flew Heron drones leased from Israel. The Heron drones were used for surveillance and did not carry weapons. In 2011, military leaders requested $600-million to buy armed drones for use in the Libyan war. Their request was denied.
Then, in 2017, Canada’s Strong, Secure, Engaged defence policy, in initiatives 50 and 91, outlined a path for drone acquisition by the Royal Canadian Air Force. Soon after, Canada’s Department of National Defence (DND) renamed the JUSTAS program the Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS) procurement project. RPAS, currently in stage three of five, is expected to cost between one and five billion dollars. DND hopes to award contracts in 2022 or 2023 and have drones in operation by 2025.
Armed drones on the Canadian military horizon - Project Ploughshares
The Canadian government appears to be moving closer to acquiring armed drones. According to Justin Ling of Vice News, Canadian government officials recently briefed industry partners on systems requirements, with long-range surveillance and the ability to engage targets remotely seen as key to proteploughshares.ca
Our bayonets suck too becasue they break easily. Unless they fixed that when I wasn't lookingBehind in the drone game, the artillery game, the Air Defense game, did I miss any?
FTFYWithout reopening the whole howitzer vs mortar debate, Patria's Nemo mortar system now has fire on the move capability.
https://defence-blog.com/news/army/patrias-modern-mortar-system-get-new-superior-feature.html
Adds a whole new level to the towed vs self-propelled survivability question.
Are we again a generation behind the thinking in our replacement gear? We talk about replacing WWII era towed artillery withVietnamWW 2 era self-propelled artillery while others are starting to roll out fire-on-the-move platforms.
Tongue depressors on both sides and some duct tapeOur bayonets suck too becasue they break easily. Unless they fixed that when I wasn't looking
This has become our traditionWithout reopening the whole howitzer vs mortar debate, Patria's Nemo mortar system now has fire on the move capability.
https://defence-blog.com/news/army/patrias-modern-mortar-system-get-new-superior-feature.html
Adds a whole new level to the towed vs self-propelled survivability question.
Are we again a generation behind the thinking in our replacement gear? We talk about replacing WWII era towed artillery with Vietnam era self-propelled artillery while others are starting to roll out fire-on-the-move platforms.
I'll believe it after it's been evaluated by a third party rather than touted in a glossy sales brochure. I note in their previous material they talked about "fire on the move" capability only about their navy gunboat system.Without reopening the whole howitzer vs mortar debate, Patria's Nemo mortar system now has fire on the move capability.
https://defence-blog.com/news/army/patrias-modern-mortar-system-get-new-superior-feature.html
Adds a whole new level to the towed vs self-propelled survivability question.
Are we again a generation behind the thinking in our replacement gear? We talk about replacing WWII era towed artillery with Vietnam era self-propelled artillery while others are starting to roll out fire-on-the-move platforms.
That's a very intricate, built for purpose, piece of kit. Makes me wonder why they didn't go the extra mile to just put the thing under armour in the first place. The mechanism to unload the mortar looks like a heavy piece of equipment all of it's own. The side panel door with ammo looks to me like it means it's hand loaded in the traditional fashion and from what I read can be directed from either inside or outside the vehicle. Interestingly it only carries 60 rds.Well this is a novel way packing a vehicle borne mortar, not sure how much I like it though.
https://i1105.photobucket.com/album...e_with_Ukrainian_army_925_001_zpsh1r11ppf.jpg
That's a very intricate, built for purpose, piece of kit. Makes me wonder why they didn't go the extra mile to just put the thing under armour in the first place. The mechanism to unload the mortar looks like a heavy piece of equipment all of it's own. The side panel door with ammo looks to me like it means it's hand loaded in the traditional fashion and from what I read can be directed from either inside or outside the vehicle. Interestingly it only carries 60 rds.
Thanks especially for the videos which confirm what I thought. Operated from outside right up to and including firing with a long lanyard.A couple of links with moving pictures . . .
The mobile mortar complex Bars-8MMK demonstrated its capabilities at the "Arms and Security 2017"
During the exhibition, all components of the complex were demonstrateden.ukrmilitary.com
Ukrainian Army received first BARS-8MMK mobile mortar systems
Ukrainian Army received first BARS-8MMK mobile mortar systems | Чесні та головні новини про армію, війну та оборонку. Хроніки деокупації.mil.in.ua
This particular piece of kit (the mortar, not the vehicle) seems to be Spanish in origin.
I dunno ... I could never figure out why the Brits needed to separate load -- load projectile ... ram projectile ... load cartridge -- on the 105 when semi fixed NATO standard 105 works about the same on the M119 but is easier (simpler to load).I dunno... the L118 light gun is still a nice little number IMHO: