Michael Dorosh said:
I hope anyone that gets it will post their reactions here.
I'd be encouraged to hear that things like dismounting to recce on foot were also included.
This is based on my impressions of the Pro version that I have been toying with, but there is NO dismounted ability in SB2Pro (and likely the lite versions). This is, IMO, a hugely limiting factor in employing it beyond what, arguably, is it's key function: an armour sim. We (the Armour Corps) still have to maintain tank tactics for the short term (while we have Leo's) and then evolve to whatever we will call DF unit tactics (likely "tank tactics" even though it won't neccesarily be in tanks, proper). SB2Pro will work, very capably IMO, for this purpose, but due to the lack of dismounts, will have very limited capabilities for Coyote or G-Wagon recce. Nils Hinrichssen said that they are looking at bringing in polygon dismounts to replace sprite based (geek speak, but means 3D vs 2D) models for the dismounts. At the moment, the dismounts (for inf sections and for dismounts from Bradleys) are only able to be AI controlled (AFAIK), and the AI for them, the last time I looked, was less than stellar.
From the last time that I used SB2Pro in any depth (prior to Xmas), there have been a lot of improvements, as eSims, like any good company, listens to their audience, and makes improvements. Having said that, if people don't ask for (read as: pay for) things, such as dismounts, UAV's, helo's, etc, the company isn't going to take the time to develop something. And based on what Nils mentioned, the dismount ability won't be at the level of, say VBS or BF2, or similiar games/sims. Again, because it is designed as an armoured sim.
IMO, SB has a somewhat limited audience (mech warfare) and it does it very well. The gunnery aspect of it is very close to the high fidelity simulators that we use, especially if you have the money to buy the extras, such as realistic power controllers for the gunnery controls, but they run around $2000 for very close to identical to the real thing (a 3rd party company that caters to dedicated enthusiasts I imagine), down to $50 for a Saitek Evo joystick, which does the job. It depends on your budget, and how close you want to replicate the "experience" (BTW, the $50 joystick is more than suitable). Oh yeah: add in a 3D visor (virtual reality helmet) for about $1000 and you are only missing the smell of cordite (and the farts from your gunner after ingesting cordite).
If you have the money, and want to do the dismount thing very well, off the shelf, look at VBS1, which starts at $150, and then pick the add on modules you want or need. VBS2 is coming out within the next 12 months (or so my spies tell me 8) ) but it will cost ~$600 US for the "base" model, and whether it is sold to the general public is not yet known to me, but it will feature a lot of the extra's that are similar from the VBS1 platform built into it, so in reality (from a mass purchase angle) will likely be cheaper per license.
The good news, if you are into holding your breath and hoping for the best, is that sim's like SB2Pro and/or VBS1 (or VBS2) may be purchased as an enterprise license, so, in theory, if you are a crewman (Reg F or Res), you would receive your very own copy of the sim to use for training. The USMC did this with Close Combat: First to Fight (they distributed 60000 copies to their marines) and if the powers that be want it (ie are willing to spend the money) it shall be so. The beauty behind this mentality is that you will have soldiers training all the time, at work, at home, on deployment, wherever, without having to book simulator time. And with Generation XBox joining the CF now, you know that soldiers will do all this training willingly. Will this (the purchase) happen? My crystal ball is in at the FCS shop for recalibration, but even I, the eternal pessimist, am cautiously optimistic that it could happen, as the reality is that it is dirt cheap (even with the costs of purchasing hardware) compared to "real" training, which face it, is too little, too late usually, or even worse, no training (in terms of potential lives lost).
Anyway, take my thoughts for what they are worth, but based on the enthusiasm at high levels that I have seen, don't be surprised if some variation of what I mentioned actually ends up happening.
Al