I think there are already process in place for people that are forcefully released without having completed a restricted release period, or an obligatory service period. This is not a new thing. What is new is that it is done for failing to attest or receive COVID-19 vaccination.
Would much rather die a certain death protecting the freedom of Canadians.
Would much rather die a certain death protecting the freedom of Canadians.
Now we have to take the shot to protect the profits of pfizer? While statistics Canada says no increase in excess mortality greater than the common cold. When it hasn't been approved by health Canada. It was previously approved under an interm order, now approved under food and drug regulations under foreign authority. Or is this fake news?
Explanatory note: Interim Order Respecting the Importation, Sale and Advertising of Drugs for Use in Relation to COVID-19 - Canada.ca
Explanatory note for The Interim Order Respecting the Importation, Sale and Advertising of Drugs for Use in Relation to COVID-19www.canada.ca
Drug and vaccine authorizations for COVID-19: Applications received - Canada.ca
Under the interim order, a company can submit an application for the use of a drug or vaccine against COVID-19.
May as well go full Alex Jones and get banned.
www.politifact.com
Vaccine effectiveness by week. This data is also seen in Germany and other European countries. I'm grateful for the sacrifice of the lives of those who chose to take this shot.This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series: A Danish cohort study
In this brief communication we are showing original research results with early estimates from Danish nationwide databases of vaccine effectiveness (VE) against the novel SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) up to five months after a primary vaccination series with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273...www.medrxiv.org
I heard it was more than that from leaked pfizer documents that the US courts have ordered sealed untill.... 2074? lmao.
There you go again, bringing facts into an Internet argument.May as well go full Alex Jones and get banned.
FACT CHECK The vaccine does not cause infertility.Pfizer employee didn’t say COVID vaccine causes infertility
As people start to receive Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, social media users continue to share misinformation about the inje
Vaccine effectiveness by week. This data is also seen in Germany and other European countries. I'm grateful for the sacrifice of the lives of those who chose to take this shot.
Looks like natural immunity is on the table with a minimum of rare and adverse side-effects. I do feel bad for those with the sunk-cost fallacy.
Anyways, it's in the release from the CDS. You must take this shot or you are disloyal to Canada. So just get the shot you sexist racist misogynistic bigots (Prime Minister Trudeaus words not mine)They also say there is no religious reason to not take these shots.. Meanwhile they are made from abortions. No the vaccines do not contain abortions. They are made from abortions.
Thankfully immunizebc is ready to debunk my previous statement:
I heard it was more than that from leaked pfizer documents that the US courts have ordered sealed untill.... 2074? lmao.
edit: source on sealed documents claim: fda wants 55 years to process foia request - Google Search
edit: source on claim that CAF members were not ordered to be vaccinated but ordered to submit to a loyalty test, CDS directive 002 on CAF COVID-19 vaccination – Implementation of Accommodations and Administrative Action - Canada.ca
edit: Source on claim about statscan: Excess mortality in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic Sure. By day and week it can be higher sometimes. But overall by month for each province? It's just not there.
Edit: This is exactly where I am now, who radicalized me? It was you.
Excellent.
www.reuters.com
www.gocomics.com
Have you decided on what post CAF career you are aiming for?Excellent.
Most of those were actually vaccines as per the 2018 definition of the word. You got the shot. It was approved by health Canada. It was extremely safe. What was it? 15 people die a year from each vaccine like polio. Nothing, a drop in the bucket for the greater good. And then at MOST you took a second dose, and that was it. You were immune. AND IF YOU GOT INJURED YOU COULD SUE! I'm not vaccine hesitant. It feels like I've had at least 20.
Then these shots came out. Brand spanking new mRNA juice, JUST TRUST THE SCIENCE, no long term studies needed! Also, these shots are behind a legal liability shield, you can no longer sue them for adverse events. (Edit: But don't worry Canada has just rolled this out: Programme de soutien aux victimes d’une vaccination to help)
"Health Canada has authorized the sale of this COVID-19 vaccine under an Interim Order."
The laws have been changed or amended to allow them to be "rapidly brought to market".
Meanwhile governments started inflating death tolls:COVID-19 vaccine safety: Report on side effects following immunization - Canada.ca
Information about any adverse events following immunization (AEFI) that individuals have reported after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine in Canada. These adverse events are not necessarily related to the vaccine.health-infobase.canada.ca
Instead of dying from cancer or lung failure, every death WITH covid is called a covid death. One particular case in Canada:Fact check: 94% of individuals with additional causes of death still had COVID-19
Shared thousands of times on Facebook, posts claim that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “quietly updated” its COVID-19 data “to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 (U.S.) deaths recorded actually died from (COVID-19).” According to the posts, the CDC...
Suddenly there are more vaccine deaths and injuries than every other vaccine in the past twenty years. Combined. Yes, still extremely unlikely (for now) that you are harmed by this in the short term .01% (source: health Canada as of this post). How about in 5 years? Now we know that the covid-19 vaccines (I use the term vaccine loosely) has many rare cases of side effects:
Rare Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), rare myocarditis, rare capillary leak syndrome, rare Thrombocytopenia, rare facial paralysis/ bells palsy, rare cardiac arrest, rare kidney injury, rare liver injury, rare strokes, rare spinal cord inflammation, rare fetal growth restriction, rare spontaneous abortions, and rare skin immune reactions.
Almost every other shot (I'll use Polio as an example) the most common side effect is being allergic. We don't even know if it has any other side effects because they are so rare. Poliomyelitis vaccine: Canadian Immunization Guide - Canada.ca
So that takes us back to the topic of this thread. Disobeying an unlawful/unethical order.
They couldn't mandate this shot. That would be illegal. In order to get around that, the directive was given as a loyalty test. So that's what it is. Take this experimental juice (that has yet to have any measure of approval that real vaccines have had) that may irreparably harm your body when we KNOW it doesn't stop transmission and we know the average CAF member should have an extremely high survival rate.
Legal or illegal? This one will have to be decided in court. It is likely the court will trample on the person.
Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson for November 29, 1995 | GoComics.com
Calvin: These are interesting times. We don't trust the government, we don't trust the legal system, we don't trust the media, and we don't trust each other! We've undermined all authority, and with it, the basis for replacing it! Hobbes: "Interesting" is a mild way of putting it. Calvin...
Uh, I'm not sure if you've heard, but they just did.
globalnews.ca
yes.
i might be wrong here but I think Government can impose rules on things like capacities for health and safety reasons but are limited on what they can impose on the employees as that is likely an employer-employee thing governed by other rules. My son works at a restaurant but has not had to show proof of vaccination once. Just screening questions every time he goes in. I too find it strange but my guess is jurisdiction. Which is why the Province and Feds can mandate vaccines for its employees and contractors but can’t for Jack and Jill at the local tuck shop.
So you’re ok with with food service types and dentists not wearing masks or gloves? How about dental tools? Ok with them not cleaning those or is that their responsibility?
Good news is, absolutely nobody is forcing you to get the vaccine. If you don’t want to do your job anymore, they won’t keep making you do it. Best of luck in whatever you do next.Excellent.
Most of those were actually vaccines as per the 2018 definition of the word. You got the shot. It was approved by health Canada. It was extremely safe. What was it? 15 people die a year from each vaccine like polio. Nothing, a drop in the bucket for the greater good. And then at MOST you took a second dose, and that was it. You were immune. AND IF YOU GOT INJURED YOU COULD SUE! I'm not vaccine hesitant. It feels like I've had at least 20.
Then these shots came out. Brand spanking new mRNA juice, JUST TRUST THE SCIENCE, no long term studies needed! Also, these shots are behind a legal liability shield, you can no longer sue them for adverse events. (Edit: But don't worry Canada has just rolled this out: Programme de soutien aux victimes d’une vaccination to help)
"Health Canada has authorized the sale of this COVID-19 vaccine under an Interim Order."
The laws have been changed or amended to allow them to be "rapidly brought to market".
Meanwhile governments started inflating death tolls:COVID-19 vaccine safety: Report on side effects following immunization - Canada.ca
Information about any adverse events following immunization (AEFI) that individuals have reported after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine in Canada. These adverse events are not necessarily related to the vaccine.
Instead of dying from cancer or lung failure, every death WITH covid is called a covid death. One particular case in Canada:Fact check: 94% of individuals with additional causes of death still had COVID-19
Shared thousands of times on Facebook, posts claim that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “quietly updated” its COVID-19 data “to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 (U.S.) deaths recorded actually died from (COVID-19).” According to the posts, the CDC...
Suddenly there are more vaccine deaths and injuries than every other vaccine in the past twenty years. Combined. Yes, still extremely unlikely (for now) that you are harmed by this in the short term .01% (source: health Canada as of this post). How about in 5 years? Now we know that the covid-19 vaccines (I use the term vaccine loosely) has many rare cases of side effects:
Rare Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), rare myocarditis, rare capillary leak syndrome, rare Thrombocytopenia, rare facial paralysis/ bells palsy, rare cardiac arrest, rare kidney injury, rare liver injury, rare strokes, rare spinal cord inflammation, rare fetal growth restriction, rare spontaneous abortions, and rare skin immune reactions.
Almost every other shot (I'll use Polio as an example) the most common side effect is being allergic. We don't even know if it has any other side effects because they are so rare. Poliomyelitis vaccine: Canadian Immunization Guide - Canada.ca
So that takes us back to the topic of this thread. Disobeying an unlawful/unethical order.
They couldn't mandate this shot. That would be illegal. In order to get around that, the directive was given as a loyalty test. So that's what it is. Take this experimental juice (that has yet to have any measure of approval that real vaccines have had) that may irreparably harm your body when we KNOW it doesn't stop transmission and we know the average CAF member should have an extremely high survival rate.
Legal or illegal? This one will have to be decided in court. It is likely the court will trample on the person.
Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson for November 29, 1995 | GoComics.com
Calvin: These are interesting times. We don't trust the government, we don't trust the legal system, we don't trust the media, and we don't trust each other! We've undermined all authority, and with it, the basis for replacing it! Hobbes: "Interesting" is a mild way of putting it. Calvin...
So I guess all these food safety rules I enforce at restaurants and grocery stores dont matter huh, guess I'll start telling people handling saw meat they don't have to wash their hands, not their responsibility to protect you from food borne pathogens right?
