- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
PuckChaser said:Probably way off topic now, but the CT people aren't the same as the OT people who aren't the same as the off the street people.
Keep in mind the CAF doesn't owe you a job when you're OTing. They make an effort to recognize your experience but you're still going to need the same QL3 course as a civilian off the street, you just are able to do it right away because you don't need BMQ. Needs of the service always come first, and if they are full for a certain trade, or the training system can't handle more people for the year, you don't get a job just like everyone else. Like it or not, PRes members don't have an opportunity to get in via internal SIP numbers. You'll need to follow the advice of your broker, it's pretty clear. You're not getting those trades unless you're already qualified.
Fair enough, I totally understand. I think the root of my disappointment is that it is far too easy for a member to submit at CT-OT and then when nothing happens after a year it is frustrating to see people off the street get in with quicker for the same trade, while having relevant military experience, higher education and positive reviews from both your unit and other units. I think a better system would be to have CT/OT's to be processed through the CFRC, acknowledging that the file is fully complete after an interview (possibly a CFAT if it is too old and not done electronically) and then use the existing merit board system and if you aren't competitive, either fix yourself or pick a different trade. In any event it is what is, and bitching on army.ca isn't going to change anything.
I do think that the CT system is fairly good for CT (T)'s to CT(T)'s because it is the best of both worlds. We have a cpl with x,y,z quals can any unit use them, yup send cpl xxx to unit z. Or no we can't try again later and then you wait. If you took the CT/OTs out of DMCPG responsibility they would have more time to handle CT (T)s and waste less time dealing with CT/OT's. Furthermore the Res F could better augment the Reg-F and the Reg-F would get the needed pers quicker.
Re: LOG/MARS, I'm aware but it honestly isn't realistic, I have no idea where I'll be career wise or location wise for the long term, I can't honestly pick a unit and say that I'll stay there, furthermore I'm also done school and no longer have summers to give to the army. It isn't realistic for me to expect my employer to hold my job at an entry level position while I go on course for LOG/MARS when countless people would gladly do the job. Contract work could be an option but again I'd be doing this all for hopes and dreams that I'll even be a competitive applicant for said trades. For the short term it is much more advantageous for me to stay as a qualified CPL, that way should I move or go for a masters I'll be able to find CLS A work.
It is what its is, I picked the element and the trade that I picked. With that being said, I am happy as a reservist in my current trade although had I of known that it would it would of been this difficult to transfer after school I would of joined the NAV RES in the beginning. In any event I'll pick the three Navy OP trades again and wait out.
Cheers and thanks for the assistance/advice,