- Reaction score
- 35
- Points
- 560
Since we need to get rid of garbage anyway, this offers a chance to get some "value added" benefits out of garbage disposal. The end of ineffective "Blue Box" programs is a financial benefit for hard pressed civic budgets as well. I am somewhat dubious of the numbers, but even if it is close it is worth looking at:
http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=637
http://www.erwingerrits.com/?p=637
Ottawa company Plasco Energy Group has a patent-pending WTE (Waste to Energy) system called Plasma Gasification (I’ve written about them before here and my subsequent brush with fame). From the Plasco site:
The MSW stream enters the conversion chamber where the waste is converted into a crude syngas using recycled heat. The crude syngas that is produced flows to the refinement chamber where plasma torches are used to refine the gas into a cleaner syngas, known as PlascoSyngas. This is sent through a Gas Quality Control Suite to recover sulphur, remove acid gases and segregate heavy metals found in the waste stream. The result is a clean, energetic PlascoSyngas created from the conversion of waste with no air emissions.
PlascoSyngas is used to fuel internal combustion engines that efficiently generate electricity. Waste heat recovered from the engines is combined with waste heat recovered from cooling the PlascoSyngas in a Heat Recovery Steam Generation (HRSG) unit to produce steam. The steam can either be used to generate additional electricity using a turbine (combined cycle generation), or it can be used for industrial processes or district heating (cogeneration).
The solid residue from the conversion chamber is sent to a separate high temperature Carbon Recovery Vessel (CRV) equipped with a plasma torch where the solids are melted. Plasma heat is used to stabilize the solids and convert any remaining volatile compounds and fixed carbon into crude syngas. This additional crude syngas is fed back into the conversion chamber. Any remaining solids are then melted into a liquid slag and cooled into small slag pellets. The slag pellets are an inert vitrified residue sold as construction aggregate.
So what?
In my view, we can use this process across Canada to:
1. Stimulate the economy
2. Reduce polluting landfill sites
3. Cancel all costly and non-working recycling programs
4. Reduce our dependency on oil and coal
5. Reduce CO2 and methane emissions (if that’s important to you)
6. Create new jobs
7. Generate more power cleanly
Show me some numbers!
Canada uses about 530B KWh a year (2006 est.) of electricity, generated by the following:
fossil fuel: 28%
hydro: 57.9%
nuclear: 12.9%
other: 1.3% (2001)
Lets take out the hydro and nuclear/other portion of this number, since they are clean, renewable and profitable energy sources. Let’s focus on fossil fuel energy alone:
28% of 530B KWh = about 150B KWh.
Plasco can generate 1.2 MWh = 1200 KWh from every tonne of waste converted:
150B KWh / 1200 = 125 MT of waste required to generate 150B KWh.
125 MT per year, that’s 342,000 tonnes per day. To process that amount of garbage, Plasco needs to build 342,000 / 400 tonnes/day plants (average size) = 855 average sized plants across Canada.
In other words, in order to retain the status quo in energy production, and to completely eliminate fossil fuel burning to generate energy, we need to build 855 Plasco plants across this nation to process 342,000 tonnes of garbage a day.
Fine, but do we have enough garbage?
Total solid waste production in Canada was 30.4 MT in 2005 (latest figures available), so not only will we process ALL available garbage generated in Canada today (including all recyclables), we will also start digging into our existing landfill sites at a tune of about 100 MT a year.
The Ottawa Carp Road Landfill site currently holds about 10,000,000 cubic metres of garbage @ 150Kg a cubic meter, makes 15MT of garbage. There are about 800 -10000 (the number varies and is hard to track down) of these landfill sites across Canada, making for (minimum) 800 x 15MT = 12,000 MT or (maximum) 10,000 x 15MT = 150,000 MT available garbage for plasma gasification.
At a required usage of 100 MT/yr, the existing landfills will be emptied in 12,000 MT / 100 MT= 120 years (for 800 sites), or 150,000 MT / 100 MT = 1500 years (for 10000 sites), and that is not counting the new garbage that will be generated in that amount of time, so suffice to say, there’s fuel enough.
So how much is all of this going to cost?
A Plasco plant operates at zero cost to the tax payers. In addition, we will save money by cancelling all current money-losing recycling programs across the country. Plasco is completely funded by private donations and operational revenues. The tipping fee is $40/tonne, about the same as a landfill would charge. Revenues are generated by selling electricity to the power company, and selling the other by-products of the process: potable water, commercial salt, construction aggregate and sulfur agricultural fertilizer . They need, however, a significant investment for each plant to be built.
Is this where the stimulus package comes in?
Yes, a $30B Economic Stimulus package (as currently proposed in the upcoming budget) would provide the needed 855 plants with a start-up capital of over $35M each, more than half of what is needed for initial start up, or we can build 400 plants with full financing. Rather than giving (or “loaning” money to companies who will not be able to pay it back) money to GM/Chrysler/Banks/Credit Cards(!) we can invest the money in a nation-wide garbage to energy strategy, and come out with the following results:
* create new jobs
* cancel costly and money-losing (and polluting) recycling programs that don’t work
* reduce and eliminate costly and polluting landfill sites
* reduce CO2 & methane (24 MT/yr) from elimination of coal burning plants & landfill sites
* alternative energy source - less reliance on oil & coal
* generate power in a energy hungry world
You’re beating a dead horse: we already know all this!
Yes, we do, but governments don’t. And that is where the sad part comes in: governments don’t seem to be on board. In Ontario, environmental laws prohibit permanent installations of this sort: simply because current environmental laws are based on tests done in the early eighties. Back then, testing was done on garbage incinerators (and they would literally burn garbage with no effort to clean up the process) and the emissions were deemed to be too high (no kidding). There have not been any testing done since. Plasco’s unique Plasma Gasification process WITH NO EMISSIONS still falls under “Garbage Incineration” and as such is deemed to be too polluting. Plasco can only get a “testing facility” license from the Government of Ontario and as such will not be able to run on full capacity any time soon. I am sure similar practises are going on across this country.
Governments need to get on board and realise these new technologies not only “help reduce garbage” but also create jobs, clean up the air, generate more power, stop ground pollution, and lessens our reliance on fossil fuels.
Time has come to fast track these technologies, make the laws compatible, pour some ’stimulus’ money into it, and get goin’!