- Reaction score
- 17,069
- Points
- 1,010
Nope. Apollo.CHA in Libya?
Nope. Apollo.CHA in Libya?
This is the nub of the problem.Thanks, I appreciate your frankness. I was a little surprised at first by everyone's visceral reaction to the post, I was hoping that people wouldn't judge the book by its cover.
I don't have a problem personally with "hard" bosses, in the sense of demanding leaders. As long as they're fair and, you're right, as long as they have tactical acumen. I have been, in exercise, under the command of a Colonel, who was basically commanding a square combat team, and he had us attack the entire 1R22R who were dug up - Leopards included - on the highest mount in Gagetown... We're talking of a ratio of 1 against 3, at best. Our combat team got wiped out in seconds. And I'm not even mentioning the fiasco of receiving the orders 1 hour after H-Hour... You can't make that stuff up. Well, that Colonel was promoted to BGen, not long after. I'm not implying that he was toxic, but he laid out his complete incompetence in front of a good portion of 5 Bde.
So I guess my point is: what matters is that you're a competent officer/NCM when it comes to doing your actual job: warfighting. There should be no such criteria as competent/incompetent leader in garrison. That would be the equivalent of a firefighter who's very effective at the fire station but doesn't know how to put out a fire.
Yes, 1985. No doubt we are talking about the same officer. ‘Salty’ is rather mild in describing her vocabulary.
But she could be great fun out drinking.
I wondered back then if her manner could be partially attributed to putting up a front, to be "one of the boys". Remember, back then, certain "differences" could lead to the attention of a three letter unit and potential for loss of career.
Psychopaths aren't necessarily hardened criminals. Regardless, people who are born psychopaths don't deserve to be in prison. Whatever is proposed to deal with people with unfortunate innate characteristics can't be punishment."Functional sociopaths", I love the term. When I mentioned "psychopaths", what I actually read from psychology was that toxic leaders exhibited signs of being psychopaths, but were not psychopaths in the sense of hardened criminals
If more people emulated that line of thinking then this world would be far better off.Wasn’t quite there with only three weeks as an OCdt under my belt… lol
I suppose that could have been the case, but it doesn’t negate nor excuse the treatment she gave, particularly to the young women on course. On of my platoon mates successfully pursued a career in the CF as a nurse and we stayed in touch for quite some time, and she told me that the Capt’s treatment of the female OCdts stayed with her as a “never be like that example.”
I suppose that could have been the case, but it doesn’t negate nor excuse the treatment she gave, particularly to the young women on course. On of my platoon mates successfully pursued a career in the CF as a nurse and we stayed in touch for quite some time, and she told me that the Capt’s treatment of the female OCdts stayed with her as a “never be like that example.”
Check here under 'admin',.....subscriptions or donations help Mr. Bobbitt keep the lights on.Just curious, under your avatar I read "staff member, directing staff, and subscriber". What do those mean? I saw "donor" and "mentor" too.
Situational. Churchill was beloved as a national leader then shown the door the moment the war was over.Look, I am sorry if I hit you between the eyes in my first post. I am deathly sick of being sold snake oil by consultants who do not understand the first thing about warfare or the profession of arms. That is clearly not you. But, the DND/CAF have a bad habit of bringing in outsiders to impose solutions that don’t fit the problem set. So, forgive my knee jerk reaction when another consultant comes along and annoys me where I go to relax- army.ca.
Leadership has been a life long area of interest to me. What makes humans tick under combat conditions is fascinating. In my own experience, I served under one Commanding Officer who was a bully and and I generally hated because he was so hard on subordinates. Here is the “but” : when we were on operations, under near combat conditions, I actually came to respect him for his tactical acumen and his desire to win. I felt, if shooting actually started, we had a good chance of winning with him in charge.
This is where my feelings are conflicted: he was a terrible peace time leader. Toxic, by today’s definition. And yet…I wanted to follow him in combat. Does that make any sense? It doesn’t to me. How do we develop combat leaders, with the desire and skills to win a fight, without them also burning down a peace time military?
That offends me…At the risk of offending @SeaKingTacco there's alot of work being done by consultants, and others, to better understand and address the issue of toxic leadership in the workplace. It's far bigger issue than just within the CAF, of course, which reflects the macro issues within society to a certain extent, especially as it pertains to the ongoing struggle to build more diverse workplaces. Viz:
Leaders, Stop Rewarding Toxic Rock Stars
Research has shown that toxic cultures are extremely costly for companies, and toxic culture was the single biggest predictor of attrition during the first six months of the Great Resignation. “Toxic rock stars,” or bullies who evade consequences because they deliver results, can ruin the workplace experience for most employees, but they’re particularly harmful to women of color. In the midst of the fight for talent, at a time when the link between diversity and better business outcomes is finally being understood and when external stakeholders are demanding accountability on diversity metrics, company leaders must look carefully at the wide-ranging impacts of tolerating and rewarding high-performing bullies at the expense of culture, particularly as they impact women of color.
Leaders, Stop Rewarding Toxic Rock Stars
Research has shown that toxic cultures are extremely costly for companies, and toxic culture was the single biggest predictor of attrition during the first six months of the Great Resignation. “Toxic rock stars,” or bullies who evade consequences because they deliver results, can ruin the...hbr.org
Thank-you.While the talk on toxic leaders is worthwhile, I wish we could address the narrative somewhat. For every toxic leader in the CAF, there are probably five good ones (completely unscientific). I've dealt with some toxic leaders, and they pop up for various reasons, but fortunately, that's an infrequent occurrence, but I see good leadership everyday. But you'll never see news articles about the good deeds our leaders do on a daily basis. In the last month, I've seen leaders:
I could go on, but I think it is evident.
- Go out of their way to assist a member who lost an immediate family member;
- Take their time to do daily checks on a member with mental health issues;
- Take personal time to mentor and support another member on physical fitness when the member was having issues;
- Design engaging training, over and above what was called for, because they believe the soldiers deserve world class training, and then deliver that training which was noted by some participants to be "the best they've done in their time in the CAF."
I think this is a great point, there is a lot of really good daily things on the go that isn't necessarily exceptional. The really bad and really good ones stick out in your memory, but the generally solid and consistently reasonable ones don't jump to mind.While the talk on toxic leaders is worthwhile, I wish we could address the narrative somewhat. For every toxic leader in the CAF, there are probably five good ones (completely unscientific). I've dealt with some toxic leaders, and they pop up for various reasons, but fortunately, that's an infrequent occurrence, but I see good leadership everyday. But you'll never see news articles about the good deeds our leaders do on a daily basis. In the last month, I've seen leaders:
I could go on, but I think it is evident.
- Go out of their way to assist a member who lost an immediate family member;
- Take their time to do daily checks on a member with mental health issues;
- Take personal time to mentor and support another member on physical fitness when the member was having issues;
- Design engaging training, over and above what was called for, because they believe the soldiers deserve world class training, and then deliver that training which was noted by some participants to be "the best they've done in their time in the CAF."
Agreed. And sometimes it can be a consistant amount of good non exceptional things that make people feel like they have good leaders.I think this is a great point, there is a lot of really good daily things on the go that isn't necessarily exceptional. The really bad and really good ones stick out in your memory, but the generally solid and consistently reasonable ones don't jump to mind.
Having said that, I've had probably a dozen solid bosses, a few really good ones, and one really bad one in the CAF, and the really bad one had me applying for jobs with the intent to release, so doesn't necessarily take much. (At the time I stayed in because I had some great peers and mentors in the crew that made me realize I wasn't actually a soup sandwhich and my boss was junk).
Yeah, I'll take a consistent and consistently decent person any day of the week (as a boss, peer or subordinate).Agreed. And sometimes it can be a consistant amount of good non exceptional things that make people feel like they have good leaders.
Good point - as in much of life, 95-99% of the keeners suffer because of the 1-5% of weinersWhile the talk on toxic leaders is worthwhile, I wish we could address the narrative somewhat. For every toxic leader in the CAF, there are probably five good ones (completely unscientific). I've dealt with some toxic leaders, and they pop up for various reasons, but fortunately, that's an infrequent occurrence, but I see good leadership everyday. But you'll never see news articles about the good deeds our leaders do on a daily basis. In the last month, I've seen leaders:
I could go on, but I think it is evident.
- Go out of their way to assist a member who lost an immediate family member;
- Take their time to do daily checks on a member with mental health issues;
- Take personal time to mentor and support another member on physical fitness when the member was having issues;
- Design engaging training, over and above what was called for, because they believe the soldiers deserve world class training, and then deliver that training which was noted by some participants to be "the best they've done in their time in the CAF."
Good point - as in much of life, 95-99% of the keeners suffer because of the 1-5% of weiners