- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
Well, I wasn't trying to compare the really high end lenses (besides, I know jacsh@t about Canon...I'm a Nikon guy ;D). As you probably know, most people cannot afford/are not willing fork out the cash for some of the top end lenses ie. I'd love a Nikkor 200-400, but I don't have $7000 to drop on it. My suggestion of the 35mm DX was to replace something like a 50mm 1.8 FX for the average user. Maybe Nikon is lacking in some areas and ahead in others...I guess they all have their niches. I did notice that there is a AFS 50 1.4G that would be close to a 85mm FX for DX cameras.deh said:You can't really compare a crop sensor consumer lens to a full frame L series professional lens. You are comparing the kia rio to a space shuttle at this point. Whenever Nikon updates their professional Prime lenses to af-s/g I'll switch the same day. As in when they update the 85mm f1.4D to G or the AI-S 35mm 1.4. Not their crop sensor kit lenses. They do make an amazing full frame zoom lens though, it is just fast primes where they are lacking.
Oh well! When I win the lottery and buy my D3x and 200-400 et al, I'll do a full review of what Nikon needs to update.