• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Search results

  1. S

    Replacing the Subs

    it seems that the government position has been get by with less for the entire CAF 30 yr gap on surface combatant numbers AOR gap submarine gap?
  2. S

    Replacing the Subs

    I feel like it wouldnt be the first time we didnt meet commitments to our Allies Whens the last time we had 15 ships? 2014? Whens the next time we are going to have 15? 2045?
  3. S

    A Deeply Fractured US

    If people have got it in their mind that Biden is not mentally capable for the job it could be an almost impossible thing to turn around. It might not cause people to vote for Trump but rather just not turn out to vote for Biden
  4. S

    Our North - SSE Policy Update Megathread

    The MRT will be shorter though?
  5. S

    Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ship AOPS

    what helo would be operated from the AOPS? Cyclone and Cormorant seem Iike too big and overkill. I see theres a Polar Icebreaker helo project too that seems like it wants something more than the Griffon
  6. S

    Replacing the Subs

    its just another AIP isnt it?
  7. S

    Replacing the Subs

    the SSKn
  8. S

    Replacing the Subs

    I doubt the French would be unwilling but I think the supply of reactors would be an issue as they have/had moved on to K22 reactor for the new SSBN from the K15 in the Barracuda, Triumphant and Charles de Gaulle. Same issue for the UK with their small production runs.
  9. S

    2024 Wildfire Season

    the only time i was in a camp everyone had there own room and 2 rooms shared a bathroom in between them.
  10. S

    2022 CPC Leadership Discussion: Et tu Redeux

    has there been rulings on embryos in Canada? Ownership? Disposal?
  11. S

    Replacing the Subs

    they wanted a SSN performance from a SSK. Is it on record that the French wouldnt sell them a nuke boat? I find that hard to believe especially when they have been very involved in Brazils. More likely that there were just cultural/relationship issues that both were at fault for Another problem...
  12. S

    Replacing the Subs

    thats always been an intriguing option would have been more of one if the Aussies made it work. Could they deliver? I think they are like the UK and set up to just barely build their own switching from attack to boomers and back again and then again money and people
  13. S

    Replacing the Subs

    i think they are going to be allergic to the cost too. Plus i dont think we can avoid buying a interim SSK even if we went SSN long term unless we get some kind of crew sharing cooperative relationship with the US and AUS
  14. S

    Replacing the Subs

    im sure we could join AUKUS, but i doubt the will is there. When would we get the first sub? Australia gets their first Virginia's in what 2032-2035? I doubt we can go that long and we going to be after that priority wise
  15. S

    Replacing the Subs

    i think nuclear is a non starter but i also dont think we have the time left on the Victorias to wait for nuke boats need a time on station graph for us like the one for Australia i hope we end up with new SSK's and UUWV
  16. S

    2022 CPC Leadership Discussion: Et tu Redeux

    id just like to get away from the party domination at least in theory. In reality we know that 20 yrs from now we will be having the same debate
  17. S

    Our North - SSE Policy Update Megathread

    deleted my reply lol looks like its a marginal improvement so still only one MBT LCAC 70+/- tons LCM 60 tons LCU 130 tons M10 44 tons ACV 35 tons?
  18. S

    Our North - SSE Policy Update Megathread

    except that the tanks were too big for the landing crafts as i understood or limited to one
  19. S

    Our North - SSE Policy Update Megathread

    not amphibious no but neither is the M1. The landing part being carried out via landing craft
Back
Top