- Reaction score
- 20
- Points
- 380
First post so I apologise if I missed a thread on this in my search.
For the last two years I have been posted into a unit fulfilling a supervisory role. Recently my CoC had to react to a development which meant reorging some personell and I happened to be one of the lucky four. I was told on a Friday morning that I would start the handover for my new position on the following Monday.
In this shuffle I have been moved to a contracts inspector position which requires myself to travel 200-400km per month. There is no CFR attached to this position.
After considering the pros and cons to utilising my POMV to fulfill this role I have decided that it really isn't worth putting the extra km on a 2013 car for 0.48 cents a km. I actually don't feel $1.50 a km would make it worth it etc. The previous military members have not had any issues using their POMV.
I filled out a MSEECD (maybe the wrong acronym) to have TEME evaluate whether the position qualifies for a vehicle (could take 18 months) and also submitted a dnd645 for a rental vehicle/a vehicle from TEME's pool of loner vehicles to perform my duty in the meantime. My WO basically looked at me in astoneshment as it seems this is a first ever request.
Long story short is it seems not using POMV will not be considered and I will most likely be moved and one of the others will have to take my place....
What publications should I be looking at for regulations that govern when you can and cannot force military members to utilise POMV for daily military business?
I think my major disagreements for this situation are the following;
1. I was never asked if I would be willing to use POMV to complete daily tasks. It was assumed. I also equally assumed that transportation would be provided if I requested after the handover is complete (handover is not yet completed)
2. If someone is posted into this position from another base what documents does the career manager have to stipulate who best suits this scenario before posting? I would be pretty upset if I was posted into this position and a CFR was never made available from the start.
Appreciate any comments on how to best help me convince the CoC that if a military member is required to fulfill a role that requires significant driving a CFR should always be available for them to utilise.
Or on the flip side if you feel the CoC is completely in the right to leave things the way they are I am interested in hearing why.
Cheers
For the last two years I have been posted into a unit fulfilling a supervisory role. Recently my CoC had to react to a development which meant reorging some personell and I happened to be one of the lucky four. I was told on a Friday morning that I would start the handover for my new position on the following Monday.
In this shuffle I have been moved to a contracts inspector position which requires myself to travel 200-400km per month. There is no CFR attached to this position.
After considering the pros and cons to utilising my POMV to fulfill this role I have decided that it really isn't worth putting the extra km on a 2013 car for 0.48 cents a km. I actually don't feel $1.50 a km would make it worth it etc. The previous military members have not had any issues using their POMV.
I filled out a MSEECD (maybe the wrong acronym) to have TEME evaluate whether the position qualifies for a vehicle (could take 18 months) and also submitted a dnd645 for a rental vehicle/a vehicle from TEME's pool of loner vehicles to perform my duty in the meantime. My WO basically looked at me in astoneshment as it seems this is a first ever request.
Long story short is it seems not using POMV will not be considered and I will most likely be moved and one of the others will have to take my place....
What publications should I be looking at for regulations that govern when you can and cannot force military members to utilise POMV for daily military business?
I think my major disagreements for this situation are the following;
1. I was never asked if I would be willing to use POMV to complete daily tasks. It was assumed. I also equally assumed that transportation would be provided if I requested after the handover is complete (handover is not yet completed)
2. If someone is posted into this position from another base what documents does the career manager have to stipulate who best suits this scenario before posting? I would be pretty upset if I was posted into this position and a CFR was never made available from the start.
Appreciate any comments on how to best help me convince the CoC that if a military member is required to fulfill a role that requires significant driving a CFR should always be available for them to utilise.
Or on the flip side if you feel the CoC is completely in the right to leave things the way they are I am interested in hearing why.
Cheers