- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 110
I have spent the last few hours completely immersed in the Stryker escapades and the changing roles of the armoured and infantry.
For Background on where I am coming from reference:
http://www.cochraneinstitute.com/Reports/preventdeaths43a.pdf
Page 118 for information on the Thunderbolt mobile gun which combines an Abrams like 120mm gun and RPG defeating passive armour with a diesel/electric hybrid engine that guzzles 24 times less fuel and can run silent off electric soley for 30 mins. It also makes room for 4 infantry soldiers in addition to the three man crew.
That being said, and drawing from conclusions by both the US Marines and the ISF it seems like the force we should be looking at is tracked offensive vehicles with built in infantry support. The Thunderbolt delivers this in spades and when operational costs are taken into account I do not see how the Stryker can even compare financially.
Furthermore, this sort of combat regime breaks down the division between the infantry and armoured. Almost like we could field ‘combat officers‘ and soldiers could specialize in mounted or dismounted trades.
These are my two thoughts on where we might look to head. Other than being frustrated about the Stryker, I would appreciate some critiques of my views.
For Background on where I am coming from reference:
http://www.cochraneinstitute.com/Reports/preventdeaths43a.pdf
Page 118 for information on the Thunderbolt mobile gun which combines an Abrams like 120mm gun and RPG defeating passive armour with a diesel/electric hybrid engine that guzzles 24 times less fuel and can run silent off electric soley for 30 mins. It also makes room for 4 infantry soldiers in addition to the three man crew.
That being said, and drawing from conclusions by both the US Marines and the ISF it seems like the force we should be looking at is tracked offensive vehicles with built in infantry support. The Thunderbolt delivers this in spades and when operational costs are taken into account I do not see how the Stryker can even compare financially.
Furthermore, this sort of combat regime breaks down the division between the infantry and armoured. Almost like we could field ‘combat officers‘ and soldiers could specialize in mounted or dismounted trades.
These are my two thoughts on where we might look to head. Other than being frustrated about the Stryker, I would appreciate some critiques of my views.