While "STANDARDS" knows what he is talking about and basically summed everything up, I thought I'd add my two cents for what its worth.
1. The problem surrounding this discussion results from the misnomer BASIC. Basic training does not equal BMQ. BMQ alone does not replace QL2. Secondly Regular Force and Reserve BMQ and SQ courses follow the same CTP (Course Training Plan) with the same number of mins allocated to each lesson. Yes, there are minute differences, (like the swim test on BMQ, which can be omitted from a Reserve course, if there is no time or pool available. However, obviously, Reservists will have to do a swim test before participating in an exercise involving something like a watercrossing)
2. To some, a soldier is not BASIC qualified until they have completed: BMQ, and SQ. To others a soldier is not BASIC qualified until they have completed BMQ, SQ, and BIQ (or trade qual). Then they are qualified, but lack experience. By participating in training and exercises they gain experience and then qualify (with the qualifications complete, time, and experience) to be promoted to cpl.
3. While the training on BMQ may seem easy, many candidates "fail" to complete the course. Courses will gradually become more challenging. Yes, there is repetition. One must not forget that review is important, and secondly, not every candidate will have the opportunity to do all 3 courses (BMQ, SQ, BIQ) back to back and therefore some need that review. That being said, believe it or not, professional comments during the course review at the end, can lead to changes (granted over time) in course content. So, for example, at the end of the SQ course, if you feel that spending 4 lessons reviewing "topic alpha" which is taught on BMQ are not necessary, put that in the Course Review and make a recommendation that it be changed to only one period of review. Also remember, that another SQ course may feel differently and write the opposite on their course review. This is why change is slow.
4. Last, a military reflects the society if serves. Through government, the citizens will voice what issues are important and the priority of spending on those issues. Training and training resources come down to money and military spending in Canada is below a few other kinds of priorities for many Canadians. So, yes putting live rounds down range, or live fire is excellent trg, but its expensive. So don't just gripe about it, vote, and as a citizen, let your MP know what you think.
Cheers
P.S. Training is what you make of it.