Good afternoon,
I have a question about my current situation so I'll start by explaining the situation.
Situation
I'm currently in the late stages of the selection process for ROTP. I have passed the CFAT with a very good result, the medical is almost completed and I have completed the interview and was told I would be highly recommended for ROTP.
However, I was also told that I would be competitive and would have a good chance of obtaining a position through CEOTP.
The Lieutenant(N) performing the interview mentioned that the selection process is in mid-February for ROTP and the second round would be mid-March with the last results/offers going out beginning of April.
He mentioned that should I not get an offer to join as a ROTP OCdt, I could "switch" my application for CEOTP and quite possibly be accepted this way.
I have been thinking about it and CEOTP is actually more in line with what I would like to do.
From what I understand, going through CEOTP would mean that I would complete basic training (possibly as early as May 09, just after the April 09 selection) and then obtain 2Lt pay. Then I would have to continue training and complete my degree within 9 years. As I currently have 54 out of 120 credits, I’m already well on my way to do so. Also, working full time and studying part time already, it wouldn’t be that different from my current situation.
Having 2Lt pay from early on would be considerably better than having OCdt pay for 2 years while I finish my degree.
My questions are these:
If I’m accepted for ROTP in the first or second selection and get an offer, can I still apply/switch my application type to CEOTP once the positions open in April?
Quite frankly, I would rather do CEOTP than ROTP, but I don’t want to shoot myself in the foot by making the application change right away and later learn that I can’t get in through CEOTP and I missed my chance for ROTP.
Also, doing a degree through CEOTP, do the CF pay for your degree the same as through ROTP, this was never made clear to me.
Any thoughts on this would be very appreciated.
Thanks!
Martin
I have a question about my current situation so I'll start by explaining the situation.
Situation
I'm currently in the late stages of the selection process for ROTP. I have passed the CFAT with a very good result, the medical is almost completed and I have completed the interview and was told I would be highly recommended for ROTP.
However, I was also told that I would be competitive and would have a good chance of obtaining a position through CEOTP.
The Lieutenant(N) performing the interview mentioned that the selection process is in mid-February for ROTP and the second round would be mid-March with the last results/offers going out beginning of April.
He mentioned that should I not get an offer to join as a ROTP OCdt, I could "switch" my application for CEOTP and quite possibly be accepted this way.
I have been thinking about it and CEOTP is actually more in line with what I would like to do.
From what I understand, going through CEOTP would mean that I would complete basic training (possibly as early as May 09, just after the April 09 selection) and then obtain 2Lt pay. Then I would have to continue training and complete my degree within 9 years. As I currently have 54 out of 120 credits, I’m already well on my way to do so. Also, working full time and studying part time already, it wouldn’t be that different from my current situation.
Having 2Lt pay from early on would be considerably better than having OCdt pay for 2 years while I finish my degree.
My questions are these:
If I’m accepted for ROTP in the first or second selection and get an offer, can I still apply/switch my application type to CEOTP once the positions open in April?
Quite frankly, I would rather do CEOTP than ROTP, but I don’t want to shoot myself in the foot by making the application change right away and later learn that I can’t get in through CEOTP and I missed my chance for ROTP.
Also, doing a degree through CEOTP, do the CF pay for your degree the same as through ROTP, this was never made clear to me.
Any thoughts on this would be very appreciated.
Thanks!
Martin