• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Passenger helps land turboprop plane after pilot dies - CNN

Yrys

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
12
Points
430
Passenger helps land turboprop plane after pilot dies

MIAMI, Florida (CNN)  -- It's a nightmarish scenario straight out of the movies: A passenger is forced
to land a plane after its pilot becomes incapacitated. But it became a reality for a passenger on board
a plane over Florida on Sunday, and for the air traffic controllers who helped him land safely in what
the National Air Traffic Controllers' Association called "an Easter miracle."

The incident began about 1:30 p.m. Sunday. The plane, a Super King Air two-engine turboprop with
four passengers on board, was headed to Jackson, Mississippi, from Marco Island, Florida, about 18
miles south of Naples. The plane entered the jurisdiction of air traffic control at Miami Center, the
facility responsible for high-altitude air traffic in southern Florida and the Caribbean, according to
a statement issued by the air traffic controllers' association.

The pilot notified controllers that the plane was at 9,000 feet and climbing, said Steve Wallace,
Miami Center spokesman for the association. However, a controller at the center tried twice
to raise the pilot after that and received no response, Wallace said. After a moment or two,
a different voice came over the radio: that of the passenger, who told air traffic controllers
that the pilot was unconscious and they needed help immediately.

The man was a pilot but was certified only in single-engine aircraft and had never flown a
King Air, according to the air traffic controllers' association statement. The difference, experts
said, is not like driving a different model of car. A turboprop multi-engine, Wallace said,
"probably lands at a faster speed than he's ever flown a single-engine plane before." The man
told air traffic controllers it appeared the pilot had died, according to the statement, and he
reported that the plane's autopilot was on and the plane was continuing to climb from 10,000 feet.

Two air traffic controllers set about helping him disengage the autopilot as other controllers
stepped in to lighten their workload. One of the two was called over to help because of her
extensive experience as a pilot and the fact that she is a licensed flight instructor, Wallace said.

Meanwhile, a third controller coordinated the rerouting of all aircraft in the area and transmitted
emergency information to Southwest Florida International Airport in Fort Myers, about 35
miles north of Naples. "Our controller walked him through disengaging the autopilot," stopping
the climb and beginning a descent toward Fort Myers, Wallace said. The controllers then turned
the plane over to air traffic controllers at the airport. One of them had called a friend who was
certified in the King Air planes for advice.

"When the friend had gotten out his flight checklists, manuals and cockpit layout sheets, he
was able to issue instructions through the controller to another controller, who then relayed
that information to the passenger flying the plane," the statement said. "They walked him
through flipping the switches, turning the knobs," Wallace said. The passenger landed the
plane safely on his first try.

Little information was released Monday on those involved. The plane was carrying a family,
said Victoria Moreland, spokeswoman for Southwest Florida International Airport, but the
name of the passenger who landed it was not released, as he had told officials he did not
want to speak to the media. The family took a commercial flight home later Sunday,
Moreland said.

The Federal Aviation Administration has not given any of the involved air traffic controllers
permission to speak about the incident, Wallace said. However, the National Air Traffic
Controllers Association lauded all of those involved in landing the plane. "If you were to ask
any one of the controllers who worked this even about what happened over the skies of
south Florida, they would tell you that it was just a typical day at the office and that it was
merely their job," association President Patrick Forrey said in the statement. "However, the
actions they all took to save the passengers aboard the flight were beyond heroic."

Moreland and the association said the pilot's death was confirmed after the plane landed. The
cause of death was unclear, Moreland said, and the pilot's name was not released. It's rare for
a pilot to suffer a medical emergency during a flight, said Chris Dancy, spokesman for the Frederick,
Maryland-based Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association.

The organization issues a yearly summary of accident trends and factors based on National
Transportation Safety Board reports involving aircraft of less than 12,500 pounds -- smaller
than the King Air involved in Sunday's incident.

According to the most recent report, which covers the year 2007, out of 22 million general aviation
flight hours -- or an estimated 15 million to 20 million flights -- only six instances of a pilot's medical
incapacitation were reported, he said. In four of those instances, the pilot died. Aboard larger planes,
the number of such occurrences likely is even smaller, he said.

But "that's actually something that pilots are trained to do is, if you need help, remember there's
somebody on the other end of the radio who can provide that help," Dancy said. And although landing
an unfamiliar aircraft is difficult, the passenger's basic knowledge and experience in flying worked to
his advantage, he said.

The plane, built in 1982, is owned by a company called White Equipment Leasing based in Archibald,
Louisiana, according to a search of FAA records. Attempts to find contact information for the company
were unsuccessful Monday.
 
Two air traffic controllers set about helping him disengage the autopilot as other controllers stepped in to lighten their workload. One of the two was called over to help because of her extensive experience as a pilot and the fact that she is a licensed flight instructor, Wallace said.

They must be Mythbusters fans.

http://mythbustersresults.com/episode94

An untrained civilian can be instructed how to successfully land a plane over the radio.

plausible

Based off of multiple airplane movies, this myth posed a challenge to the Mythbusters because they could not afford to test it using real aircraft. Instead, they used a NASA simulator. For their first test, both Adam and Jamie decided to see if they could land a plane unaided. However, since both Mythbusters had no flight experience and had no idea what most of the instruments and controls did, they both were forced to crash land their planes. In their second runs, a licensed pilot give them instructions via radio. With this help, both Adam and Jamie were able to land their planes safely. However, even though the test was a success, the pilot pointed out that most modern planes are so advanced that their autopilot systems can literally land the plane by themselves, negating the need for a civilian pilot. This information, coupled with the lack of any recorded incidents, led the Mythbusters to declare the myth plausible.
 
"The pilot pointed out that most modern planes are so advanced that their autopilot systems
can literally land the plane by themselves, negating the need for a civilian pilot."

then why did he :

"Our controller walked him through disengaging the autopilot,"

Is the autopilot difficult to reprogram?


A non-pilot puzzled person
 
Out of my lane but not all planes can land by autopliot. Depends on the type of CAT airfield they are landing on.

 
Michael O'Leary said:
An untrained civilian can be instructed how to successfully land a plane over the radio.

Not really relevant, he was a certified pilot, not an untrained civilian. Pretty wild story though.
 
benny88 said:
Not really relevant, he was a certified pilot, not an untrained civilian.

Isn't like comparing apples to rocks ? He's a "certified pilot in single-engine aircraft".

It isn't even write if he knew how to fly only with instruments, ang the techniques
are widely differents from something that must be a little Cessna to a  "Super King
Air two-engine turboprop"...
 
Yrys said:
Isn't like comparing apples to rocks ? He's a "certified pilot in single-engine aircraft".

It isn't even write if he knew how to fly only with instruments, ang the techniques
are widely differents from something that must be a little Cessna to a  "Super King
Air two-engine turboprop"...

But single engine time would be infinitely more helpful than none at all. In addition to hands and feet skills, he can communicate effectively over the radio (obviously huge in this situation) and remain more calm than a person who has no idea what they're doing. I didn't say it wasn't a very significant difference in many ways, that's what makes it so impressive; but in many basic (but important!) ways, an airplane is an airplane. (Unless it's a helicopter  :boring:)


Edit: For those of you preparing to vertically envelope me, I have nothing but respect for rotary wing pilots. Take my barb in the good humour with which it was flung.
 
NFLD Sapper said:
Out of my lane but not all planes can land by autopliot. Depends on the type of CAT airfield they are landing on.

It's not field dependant, but aircraft system's dependant.  Now, in normal conditions, you're not allowed to land in IMC conditions with autoland on a CAT I ILS (Category I Instrument Landing System, there are 3 Category). 

To add to that, I'm pretty sure that setting up the autopilot for an ILS and let it fly to the ground would be okay.  Probably not something any actualy qualified pilot would do, but that would certainly be an option for someone that doesn't have a clue of what's going on.

Yrys said:
"Our controller walked him through disengaging the autopilot,"

Is the autopilot difficult to reprogram?

Depending on the autopilot system and what you want to do.  If you want to fly a heading and an altitude, it's fairly simple.  Now, if you want to follow a GPS route and a vertical Navigation profile, coupled to an FMS, it can get pretty darn complex.  For a private pilot, with no experience with Automated Flight Systems, I can see how it's more simple and probably safer to hand fly the airplane.

Yrys said:
Isn't like comparing apples to rocks ? He's a "certified pilot in single-engine aircraft".

It isn't even write if he knew how to fly only with instruments, ang the techniques
are widely differents from something that must be a little Cessna to a  "Super King
Air two-engine turboprop"...

And airplane is an airplane.  The basics are generally the same (push the throttle, you go faster, pull it back, you go slower, pull on the stick you go up, push on the stick you go down, etc)  The King Air B200 is not a "big" airplane.  It's still a small charter airplane and handles like a big Cessna with 2 engines. There is nothing complex about that airplane.  To have an exposure to Instrument Flying is a requirement for every pilot on their Private Pilot License.  While someone without an Instrument Rating may be able to keep the aircraft on a heading, altitude and airspeed, I doubt that without training that person would be able to safely bring the aircraft back for a landing with the weather down to the approach minima.

Edit: picture of a same-model aircraft

1504254.jpg
 
SupersonicMax said:
It's not field dependant, but aircraft system's dependant.  Now, in normal conditions, you're not allowed to land in IMC conditions with autoland on a CAT I ILS (Category I Instrument Landing System, there are 3 Category). 

To add to that, I'm pretty sure that setting up the autopilot for an ILS and let it fly to the ground would be okay.  Probably not something any actualy qualified pilot would do, but that would certainly be an option for someone that doesn't have a clue of what's going on.


Like I said Max "out of my lane" but thx for the clarification.
 
Speaking as a light aircraft pilot I say congratulations to the pilot for keeping it altogether flying a twin, reacting to radio instructions and keeping a cool head including the landing.
And an additional complement for wanting to avoid the media and get out of town. Makes life a lot more pleasent just giving yourself a mental pat on the back and carrying on.
 
Back
Top