Dog said:http://www.army-guide.com/eng/article/article.php?forumID=317
Why haven't we purchased any of these things?
CanadianBoy92 said:Those are look great and look reliable.
Are you the guy from the Canadian Tire pressure washer ad? "Gas, eh? Sounds powerful."CanadianBoy92 said:Those are look great and look reliable.
Kirkhill said:http://forums.army.ca/forums/threads/35535.0.html
We've apparently looked at it, or are maybe still looking at it (???) This is the same vehicle discussed in the above thread.
Still not clear in my mnd whether the RG-31 was selected in place of the Duro/Eagle IV or whether it is being separately considered for different roles.
Eland said:Someone help me out here - to my eyes, the Eagle IV looks almost identical to the Duro APV
the government is looking at purchasing.
Or am I seeing something that isn't there?
38 battleships and approx. 65 other vessels
I think he meant warships.Ex-Dragoon said:Maybe up to and during World War 1, the present Danish Navy uses Frigates and Corvettes.
Jungle said:I think he meant warships.
The Fighting 47th said:How come the navy has as many officers and NCOs? or am I reading that wrong?
Perhaps they could take it out of our Mess dues??geo said:... we just don't pay union dues