2
2 Charlie
Guest
Warning Order:
So Gunner it is apparent that you are a WO, the Back Bone of the army, the one position between the troops and infinity. The individual, who lives Ops, has the technical knowledge of the trade, afinity for the men and respect from officers. For the Guns, the AC IG.
Stand tall.
Oh yes; now lets here your thoughts and use this topic to continue the milieu of our previous post.
It is simplistically said, what goes around comes around. When you are telling the government that although things are a little rough and personnel are stretched thin, but the job is getting doe, and done admirably.
What do you expect? Human nature as a fault causes most individuals not to react until it is usually too late. Why should we, there is nothing to fix, why fix it if it is not broken. Hence the double lie we live. Of recent times there has been a plethora of derisive and negative information that has bubbled to the surface. CFHA, pay, SAR Choppers, Sea Kings, etc (amazing how the LSVW was forgotten about)
If this had not occurred we would still be soldiering on, doing what soldiers do best in a group. The lie consists of the implied need for new equipment etc, to be heard, but the applied overtones that all is functionally well mask this.
With the politicizing and bureaucratizing of our senior leadership, it is hard to make a simple straightforward request or comment. It has to be worded or veiled in a manner that allows the presenter room to manoeuvre or extricate themselves.
At the unit/command level, yes soldiering is carried out, but if you are a WO, how much time is dedicated today to staffing priorities and other administrative perfunctionaries of the CF. Can you honestly say that this is not a fact?
If not to obviate and necessitate the cause, most of the time it confounds.
So Gunner it is apparent that you are a WO, the Back Bone of the army, the one position between the troops and infinity. The individual, who lives Ops, has the technical knowledge of the trade, afinity for the men and respect from officers. For the Guns, the AC IG.
Stand tall.
Oh yes; now lets here your thoughts and use this topic to continue the milieu of our previous post.
It is simplistically said, what goes around comes around. When you are telling the government that although things are a little rough and personnel are stretched thin, but the job is getting doe, and done admirably.
What do you expect? Human nature as a fault causes most individuals not to react until it is usually too late. Why should we, there is nothing to fix, why fix it if it is not broken. Hence the double lie we live. Of recent times there has been a plethora of derisive and negative information that has bubbled to the surface. CFHA, pay, SAR Choppers, Sea Kings, etc (amazing how the LSVW was forgotten about)
If this had not occurred we would still be soldiering on, doing what soldiers do best in a group. The lie consists of the implied need for new equipment etc, to be heard, but the applied overtones that all is functionally well mask this.
With the politicizing and bureaucratizing of our senior leadership, it is hard to make a simple straightforward request or comment. It has to be worded or veiled in a manner that allows the presenter room to manoeuvre or extricate themselves.
At the unit/command level, yes soldiering is carried out, but if you are a WO, how much time is dedicated today to staffing priorities and other administrative perfunctionaries of the CF. Can you honestly say that this is not a fact?
If not to obviate and necessitate the cause, most of the time it confounds.