McG
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 3,099
- Points
- 1,160
Huh. Bound to be a super interesting story behind this that we’ll never hear.
That will get you blacklisted…unless you deeply on our side.That’s interesting. Bluvec has a test facility just south of Kamloops. The company seems to be engaging in deep packet inspection of drone signalling, and changing the telemetry and return content, which means they are somehow gaining control of the video channels and all of the associated data.
Which to me means they are experimenting and training people to be cyber warfare types? SWAG only....That’s interesting. Bluvec has a test facility just south of Kamloops. The company seems to be engaging in deep packet inspection of drone signalling, and changing the telemetry and return content, which means they are somehow gaining control of the video channels and all of the associated data.
Both companies are located on the same street in Burnaby, B.C.; Bluvec at 3999 Henning Dr. and Pegauni at 3855 Henning. And both companies were founded in 2018.That’s interesting. Bluvec has a test facility just south of Kamloops. The company seems to be engaging in deep packet inspection of drone signalling, and changing the telemetry and return content, which means they are somehow gaining control of the video channels and all of the associated data.
The part of Burnaby Henning Dr runs through has been an informal "tech park" for decades. Nothing unusual about that part.Both companies are located on the same street in Burnaby, B.C.; Bluvec at 3999 Henning Dr. and Pegauni at 3855 Henning. And both companies were founded in 2018.
or accidental......This strikes me as an uncharacteristically bold move by our government.
Probably due to encouragement down here…This strikes me as an uncharacteristically bold move by our government.
Tough to gauge. This isn’t a new thing; it’s a quiet part of our national security apparatus but it’s been there for a while. The Orders in Council for these Investment Canada Act orders aren’t published, they’re among the small number of secret OiCs each year. We only hear about them if ISED actually publishes a news release, or if the order is challenged in court.This strikes me as an uncharacteristically bold move by our government.
Perhaps. I recall news items about disallowing or preventing a foreign investment or ownership; i.e. preventing something from happening, but not one of dissolution of a business relationship that is already in place.Tough to gauge. This isn’t a new thing; it’s a quiet part of our national security apparatus but it’s been there for a while. The Orders in Council for these Investment Canada Act orders aren’t published, they’re among the small number of secret OiCs each year. We only hear about them if ISED actually publishes a news release, or if the order is challenged in court.
At a quick search I found a couple from recent years- I’ve found cases where Canada prevented Chinese investment in a Canadian rare earth minerals company, another one of Chinese investment in a Canadian telecoms company… So it looks like the ICA reviews are being used to help stave off foreign economic interference.
What seems relatively new here is the proactive public announcement of the actions taken. Maybe that’s not actually new and I just haven’t noticed before, or maybe it’s a deliberate shift in comms strategy? Not sure.
No LPC ownership nexus, I suppose.It just struck as uncharacteristically decisive from a government and bureaucracy that are characteristically and somewhat proudly undecisive.
Very good point - from BC biz media ....That will get you blacklisted…unless you deeply on our side.
Just for the record, the info-machine's version ...
Also archived here.Government of Canada orders the dissolution of Canadian businesses following a national security review under the Investment Canada Act - Canada.ca
The Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry, made the following statementwww.canada.ca
Very good point - from BC biz media ....
View attachment 85513
Doesn’t exactly scream National Security issue, unless the technology was migrating again…Reads like classic insider intellectual property theft by an employee on their way out. Interesting.
If the BC biz media quoted the BC Supreme Court documents correctly, I'd have to wonder just how ... arms length from The Big Bosses any Chinese "cybersecurity company" would be allowed to be.Doesn’t exactly scream National Security issue, unless the technology was migrating again…