btrudy
Full Member
- Reaction score
- 465
- Points
- 810
Pretty hard to be worse than the Belgians were in the Congo.I don't think we can walk in with a diverse TF and hold the moral high ground any more than the Belgians, Spaniards, or British.
Pretty hard to be worse than the Belgians were in the Congo.I don't think we can walk in with a diverse TF and hold the moral high ground any more than the Belgians, Spaniards, or British.
Oh I know. I was pointing out that our colonial past isn't as squeaky clean as we like to think.Pretty hard to be worse than the Belgians were in the Congo.
List me the cultures or societies that have not committed some bad behavior in the past.Oh I know. I was pointing out that our colonial past isn't as squeaky clean as we like to think.
List me the cultures or societies that have not committed some bad behavior in the past.
Not going to get into this.List me the cultures or societies that have not committed some bad behavior in the past.
I think my Scottish immigrant WASPHNM grand uncle was the last non-Asian resident of Richmond, prior to passing away a few years ago…Let's just say there's more people of a WASPHNM hue in Hong Kong than Richmond. Old joke: Q. Which river separates India and China. A. The Fraser.
^^^This. I could self-flagellate myself all day for the temerity of my ancestors in colouring a quarter of the planet imperial pink. Conversely, I could go for reparations against Italy and Denmark for soundly thrashing those same ancestors a thousand years previously. I feel the hurt to this day .And that is the unspoken truth. History is violent and messy and there is no country or culture without sin.
For some reason it's just that's it's become fashionable to only recognize the sins of some... I blame our shitty post secondary education system.
This was mine too, and honestly when I was listening to some of the stories I was a bit baffled by how they could share the residential school experiences and not have a lot of hate for any 'colonizer'.I've had similar experiences with Indigenous communities.
It's almost as if we could learn alot from them about how to respectfully share different ideas and practises with others in a way that facilitates authentic engagement, understanding and appreciation.
I think my Scottish immigrant WASPHNM grand uncle was the last non-Asian resident of Richmond, prior to passing away a few years ago…
Maybe, but not in the way you expect.
For example:
Say we go to another African nation for peacekeeping or whatever, and say that nation was a colony of either France, UK, Belgium, Germany, Italy...you get my drift.
If I were the one picking candidates (I am not), maybe a thought would be "would the local population be more receptive to a white or black dude", all things being equal (e.g. they both speak the local lingua franca, etc). I would probably be considering that even more if it's not under the auspices of something like the UN.
Taking it further - same goes with women. I wasn't doing that, but I've heard that in Afghanistan, having female soldiers/etc on patrol meant that they could talk to the women, whereas generally the men could not. That gives an entire new aspect to the situation and yeah, I'd probably want to make sure that the task force includes women.
I will echo EITS on this one. I completed ADL 169 & 170 and they hit the mark far better than the GoC effort. Great training and we'll worth the time spent.This is hitting on the actual point of GBA+ (which we failed horribly to teach in the CAF).
There are several much better courses available thru the NATO Joint Advanced Learning e-school. I can provide the ADL names/#s to anyone interested. Free PD once you register on the NATO JADL site, the training covers all the things CAF GBA+ failed horribly on.
Those specific ADLs are also linked to MITE codes.
Okay so should we be enrolling folks that can't even speak one of the two constitutional and working languages of the Forces?The ombudsman noted numerous barriers to the recruitment of Armed Forces members from the designated groups had been reported over the years, including language requirements, security-clearance delays and a lack of representation among recruiters.
Bit ofpropagandamedia rehashing, from two hours ago: Military failing to remove barriers to diversifying ranks: ombudsman
Okay so should we be enrolling folks that can't even speak one of the two constitutional and working languages of the Forces?
Then, what in the world do security clearances have to do with racism?
And for the third one... so... fix racism with more racism? Got it.
So. On the topic of security clearances, we let in a bunch of people without them- a “we ll sort it out during training” thing to get the “right” folks in- there was some naming conventions that slowed things down- and residences and family etc.Bit ofpropagandamedia rehashing, from two hours ago: Military failing to remove barriers to diversifying ranks: ombudsman
Okay so should we be enrolling folks that can't even speak one of the two constitutional and working languages of the Forces?
Then, what in the world do security clearances have to do with racism?
And for the third one... so... fix racism with more racism? Got it.
Exactly.So. On the topic of security clearances, we let in a bunch of people without them- a “we ll sort it out during training” thing to get the “right” folks in- there was some naming conventions that slowed things down- and residences and family etc.
The overwhelming majority were fine- as you would expect. But we also let in a bunch of known gang members.
There is a barrier there that causes an issue for some certain applicants. But it really is necessary-
The answer? In case anyone is interested- is to take security seriously and dedicate the right amount of resources. Not to risk it out and go “oops”
Exactly.
Bit ofpropagandamedia rehashing, from two hours ago: Military failing to remove barriers to diversifying ranks: ombudsman