Search results

I found those, but scanning through them I didn't find anything on the two consecutive 30 day chits. Is there an actual policy on it, or is this just what we have been doing.

Good day, I'm looking into the policy that says that after two consecutive 30 day MEL you need a TCAT. I can't seem to find it on the CMP intranet. Can anyone point me in the right direction. Thanks

I agree with you 100% RiderPride. The problem is, I can't find any references anywhere that state that the CF protocols are the only one that should be used. I need something in writing or enough meat from how it works on other base / wings to build my case.

Guess I was in need of profile updating lol, I not at 1 Fd Amb anymore, I'm in Quebec now. Thanks for the info happy, I work alot with the SAR Techs but never taught to use them as an argument! If I were in Alberta, in Ontario or Saskatchewan I wouldn't mind using the provincial protocols even...

I guess I could have been a bit clearer in my first post. I'm having this argument with my base surgeon on how we will implement the new protocols. My understanding is that once it is approved by the surg gen, it's approved for use everywhere as long as proper training is given. Is take is that...

Hi all, I'm the training coordinator for my unit and I'm having a '' Professional Argument '' with my Base Surgeon on the day to day application of the new protocols for the QL3/QL5 Med Tech. I'm looking for information on how it is being fielded on other bases/wings to give me ammo for the...

Anyone as any info on what this means for all the unqualified QL3 sitting in the units... Cause I know 17 pte that are anxious to know what's going with that.

Sorry to bring this Narcothread back, but the rumor mill is going stronger than ever. Ans still there is never smoke without fire, the latest rumor is that it's been approved by TB and should take effect early next year. As anyone else heard info regarding that, or is it just wishfull thinking...

I don't like Ignatief and the liberals... but on this matter, he is bang on. Peacekeeping as we know it is useless and dangerous. Send 1000 soldiers in a war-torn country (when 10 000 is necessairy), with barely enough ammunition to defend themselves and tie their hands with rules of engagement...