Who needs sailors anyway?

[Kirkhill]

How big a USV would it take to float one 20 ft container?

Halcon and Rheinmetall Air Defence team up for the Skynex - EDR Magazine

By Paolo Valpolini Halcon, the company part of the EDGE group, specialised in guided weapons, unveiled at IDEX its SkyKnight

www.edrmagazine.eu

The new missile is 2.2 meters long, the body diameter is 115 mm while the wingspan is 300 mm, weight launch being 35 kg. No indication about the maximum speed was provided. Halcon proposes a 20-foot container as launcher, 60 missiles being hosted in a 6×10 cells matrix, one section of the container hosting the power supply system, the secure data-link to keep communications with the Skymaster, and the electronics to sequence fire the missiles. A Skynex battery can include up to four Oerkikon Revolver Guns and four SkyKnight launchers, a total of 240 missiles being thus available.

Each container can launch in sequence up to 20 missiles, the system being able to handle up to 80 missiles in flight at the same time. According to data provided by Halcon, the SkyKnight can cope with rotary wing aircraft and UAVs up to 10 km, against fixed wing aircraft at 8-10 km, against precision guided munitions and cruise missiles at 6 km, and against rocket-artillery-mortar threats at 4 km range.

I can't help but think a bunch of USVs with 60 SAMs in the 5 to 10 km range, would have an effect on the ability of the Houthis to dominate the Red Sea.

 

[Navy_Pete]

As soon as you have munitions and some kind of targetting/control system on board, which has all kinds of secret and top secret components on it, they want security onboard.

As soon as you have people there for security then you all the hotel facilities (which needs people to operate), and very quickly you get back to a normal ship setup.

I suspect it's different compared to a UAV because it's pretty straightforward to intercept a ship and board it where a UAV needs to crash. The international laws for operation of ships is also totally different, and loitering for a day in the air is very different than weeks of transits and weeks in op area, and what that does to the actual equipment which means maintainers on board to keep the equipment reliable so when you push a button for things to go something happens.

 

[Kirkhill]

As soon as you have munitions and some kind of targetting/control system on board, which has all kinds of secret and top secret components on it, they want security onboard.

As soon as you have people there for security then you all the hotel facilities (which needs people to operate), and very quickly you get back to a normal ship setup.

I suspect it's different compared to a UAV because it's pretty straightforward to intercept a ship and board it where a UAV needs to crash. The international laws for operation of ships is also totally different, and loitering for a day in the air is very different than weeks of transits and weeks in op area, and what that does to the actual equipment which means maintainers on board to keep the equipment reliable so when you push a button for things to go something happens.

All of which can be mitigated by operating USVs from a mother ship - preferably with a floodable well deck.

Ellida Concept

Royal Navy’s Multi Role Support Ship programme to go ahead | Navy Lookout

www.navylookout.com

BMT develop second generation ELLIDA multi-role and logistic vessel concept | Navy Lookout

www.navylookout.com

Fearless Concept

Steller Systems unveil ‘Fearless’ Multi Role Support Ship concept | Navy Lookout

www.navylookout.com

Ellida seems to lean more towards a Bay Class or Rotterdam.
Fearless seems to lean more towards a large Absalon.

Ellida, in my opinion, would fit better as part of a Task Force, relying on escorts for protection.
Fearless seems to more suited to independent action with a small on board raiding force.

My guess is that the Fearless concept has a higher unit cost than the Ellida.

 

[dimsum]

Navy ‘Hell Hounds’ Squadron Crafting Missions for Small, Lethal Drone Fleet - USNI News

CORONADO, Calif. – The Navy on Friday took another step toward creating a surface fleet seamlessly integrated with uncrewed vessels by formally establishing its second unmanned surface drone unit. The new unit, the “Hell Hounds” of Unmanned Surface Vessel Squadron 3, has received the first four...

news.usni.org

Where is the balance between machine automation and operator in the loop? Isn't that a question that the Navy has already answered?

Sort of. The CIWS could have automated functions but there is still a human in the loop. That’s one system - the question would be multiple (up to hundreds/thousands) of UxVs - does a human need to vet all of the potential kinetic actions? If so, that person (really, people) would quickly become task-saturated.

Or you change the policy to allow automated targeting and execution, which understandably isn’t going to be politically comfortable. If govts are ok with changing the policy then that question pretty much goes away, but I highly doubt that the current western democracies will want to do that.

When a helicopter, or a boat is launched the pilot or cox'n has limited authority. Those limits may be broad or tight depending on a variety of assumptions made by the command authority about the competence of the pilot or cox'n.

On board, commands such as "Weapons Free" or even "Carry On" imply delegation of authority.

Wouldn't managing UxVs fall within the same spectrum?

Your examples are valid but they’re 1 or 2 things at once (helo and boat) which is pretty easily managed compared to a swarm of UxVs with kinetic abilities.

 

[Kirkhill]

Sort of. The CIWS could have automated functions but there is still a human in the loop. That’s one system - the question would be multiple (up to hundreds/thousands) of UxVs - does a human need to vet all of the potential kinetic actions? If so, that person (really, people) would quickly become task-saturated.

Or you change the policy to allow automated targeting and execution, which understandably isn’t going to be politically comfortable. If govts are ok with changing the policy then that question pretty much goes away, but I highly doubt that the current western democracies will want to do that.


Your examples are valid but they’re 1 or 2 things at once (helo and boat) which is pretty easily managed compared to a swarm of UxVs with kinetic abilities.

Interesting.

How many UxVs can you put on a single kill switch? Do they all RTB? Or what happens if they all fall out of the sky at the same time?

 

[dimsum]

Interesting.

How many UxVs can you put on a single kill switch? Do they all RTB? Or what happens if they all fall out of the sky at the same time?

That would completely depend on the company but I doubt anyone would talk about it in an unclassified forum.

 

[Colin Parkinson]

How big a USV would it take to float one 20 ft container?

I am sure these guys can help you

 

[JMCanada]

The house always wins: how to boost ADF recruitment | The Strategist

The Australian Defence Force needs bold, creative initiatives to attract and keep enough personnel to reach expansion targets. Ask Australians in their 20s what matters to them right now, and housing will rank high. The ...

www.aspistrategist.org.au

An option for enhancing recruitment: housing support, same issue in Australia as here.

 

[dimsum]

The house always wins: how to boost ADF recruitment | The Strategist

The Australian Defence Force needs bold, creative initiatives to attract and keep enough personnel to reach expansion targets. Ask Australians in their 20s what matters to them right now, and housing will rank high. The ...

www.aspistrategist.org.au

An option for enhancing recruitment: housing support, same issue in Australia as here.

Arguably worse there bc most of their bases are near their big cities, so housing costs are higher