Booter
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,869
- Points
- 1,010
So I was with some flag officers for a thing back…2015ish. We were discussing with a soon to retire or recently retired General things like “purpose”. Even the worst missions in the last few decades was “purpose” and you would get people to work through not so great pay, equipment, and conditions- for something with purpose. They didn’t want that to be reality for young soldiers- they wanted them looked after- it was just how much of a factor “purpose” is. It may be THE factor.We had a wait list of 7000 ppl wanting to join the Army during the Afghan war years...just sayin'...
I don’t believe this includes the traditional away from danger training missions- if that’s all you have on the table you see even high performers leaving for positions where you do the job.
But sometimes it kinda strikes me that the “support at home” missions like fires and floods and pandemics keep drifting towards domination of our tasks because the government does not want us in shooting matches, it doesn’t want to pay for the kit needed and won’t risk the votes when people die.
So the military knows that it has to keep people engaged- so they keep looking for any place to add value, looking for somewhere to be operational, and then it becomes an expectation keeping down costs for other agencies that should be probably funded differently. Which is attractive.
2024 fire season is going to be absolutely gonzo- I hope you all have your trench tools ready.
You are all way more experienced than I am- so if you can correct me, please do- I left that night with this idea and I haven’t been able to shake it