There is definitely areas that have had full artillery saturation, but keep in mind that at this point neither side has the ability to throw what they want in terms of weight and duration of fire.
There are some out there that have a very frightening level of shells impacting. Keep in mind...
Agreed, but the question could also be asked does a number of Virginia type SSNs (or to be fair to the non SSN crowds a 6-10 AIP SSK) offer something that could take the slack out of some of the CSC needs?
The SA systems being trialed for the XM-30
Competitors makes the LAV turret seem like a blind man is using braille.
The LAV is very limited when buttoned up, and let’s face it in LSCO’s the CC isn’t going to be heads up in the turret looking around for targets - so your limited to vision...
Is 2 sailable 1980 era boats really a submarine capability? I think you'd grow a lot more actual skills and capability with a joint crewing model down here.
Range and speed of Virginia...
My point is that even if Canada jumps with both feet into AUKUS today - that it would take years to get a RCN crew able to fully crew a SSN. There are trades on those boats that have no Canadian equivalent - so you would need to crawl, walk, run into that sort...
No disagreement here.
Ack
Honestly my belief is that Canada would be better off joining AUKUS. However maybe a partial join, in that Canada shutters it’s Victoria’s and offers crew to the USN SSN’s?
With a vague goal of maybe potentially sometime in the undefined future could think a lot...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.